Effectiveness of Statins on Lipid Goal Attainment and Lipid Parameters in PCI Patients
- Registration Number
- NCT02561845
- Lead Sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Brief Summary
Most PCI patients are at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk, and as such here is an increased need for intensive lipid management in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) patients and the population is well suited to demonstrating rosuvastatin's low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering efficacy.Most PCI patients are at very high CV risk, and as such here is an increased need for intensive lipid management in PCI patients and the population is well suited to demonstrating rosuvastatin's LDL-C lowering efficacy.The purpose of this study is to observe the effectiveness of statins on lipid level reduction (LDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), Triglyceride (TG), and non-HDL-C) and lipid goal attainment according to recent guidelines.
- Detailed Description
The number of patients receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is rapidly increasing in China. In 2013, about 450,000 Chinese patients received PCI, most of whom suffered from coronary heart disease (CHD), especially acute coronary syndrome (ACS). ACS is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and recurrent cardiac events, underscoring the importance of identifying treatments that minimize this risk.The Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) trial suggested a benefit of lipid lowering with high-dose atorvastatin in patients with ACS. A meta-analysis of statin use in patients with ACS confirmed the benefits of early high-dose statin administration in decreasing recurrent myocardial ischemia, which suggested the clinical benefit and safety of statins were dose and statin dependent. The updated National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines recommend that intensive therapy should be considered for all patients admitted to hospital for an ACS. Two meta-analyses have shown that early intensive statin therapy in patients with ACS is associated with a reduced rate of death and cardiovascular events. In the PROVE IT study, comparing atorvastatin 80 mg with pravastatin 40 mg, a significant reduction in major adverse clinical events was observed in favour of more intensive statin treatment. In that study, the median concentration of low-density LDL-C was lowered from 106 mg/dL to 62 mg/dL in the atorvastatin 80 mg group. More recently, the 2011 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/ European Arterial Sclerosis Association (EAS) guideline for the management of dyslipidemia recommended patients with ACS are very high CV risk patients and should achieve LDL-C level \<70 mg/dl or 50% reduction. In 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) / American Heart Association (AHA) / (cardiovascular angiography and intervention Association)/ Association of Cardiovascular angiography and intervention (SCAI) Guideline for PCI, statin therapy which lowers LDL to \<70mg/dL in very high-risk patients is recommended (IIa, B). The latest China ACS consensus also recommends using the highest dose statin treatment for the acute phase and to attain an LDL-C level of 1.8 mmol/L or 50% reduction compared with baseline in long-term treatment. However, there are very limited Chinese data demonstrating the current situation of lipid management (LDL-C on-goal rate) by different statins in real-world clinical practice.
Most PCI patients are at very high CV risk, and as such here is an increased need for intensive lipid management in PCI patients and the population is well suited to demonstrating rosuvastatin's LDL-C lowering efficacy.Most PCI patients are at very high CV risk, and as such here is an increased need for intensive lipid management in PCI patients and the population is well suited to demonstrating rosuvastatin's LDL-C lowering efficacy.The purpose of this study is to observe the effectiveness of statins on lipid level reduction (LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, and non-HDL-C) and lipid goal attainment according to recent guidelines.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description rosuvastatin group rosuvastatin patients who received rosuvastatin
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) at 30 days Blood samples are collected pre-dose, 30 days post dose by assessment of statins on the on-goal rate of LDL-C treatment of patients underwent PCI
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline lipid level at 3 months Blood samples are collected pre-dose, 3 months post dose by assessment of other lipid level reduction from baseline lab value to the last lab value
Change from baseline lipid level at 6 months Blood samples are collected pre-dose, 6 months post dose by assessment of other lipid level reduction from baseline lab value to the last lab value
Change from the baseline statin dose at 12 months The dose of the treated statin is collected up to 12 months by assessment of treatment patterns and adherence of the index statin therapy
number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 at 3 months Blood samples are collected at 3 months post dose by assessment of safety profile
Change from baseline lipid level at 30 days Blood samples are collected pre-dose, 30 days post dose by assessment of other lipid level reduction from baseline lab value to the last lab value
Change from baseline lipid level at 12 months Blood samples are collected pre-dose, 12 months post dose by assessment of other lipid level reduction from baseline lab value to the last lab value
number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 at 30 days Blood samples are collected at 30 days post dose by assessment of safety profile
number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 at 12 months Blood samples are collected at 12 months post dose by assessment of safety profile
number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 at 6 months Blood samples are collected at 6 months post dose by assessment of safety profile