MedPath

Evaluation of The Accuracy of CAD-CAM Custom Made Titanium Miniplates In Positioning of the Genial Segment in Computer Guided Genioplasty

Not Applicable
Conditions
Microgenia
Macrogenia
Miniplate
Interventions
Procedure: Osseous Genioplasty
Registration Number
NCT03647865
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

In patients with chin deformeties, will using a custom made titanium plate in the positioning of the genial segments give an accurate results in comparison to the preoperative planned osteotomy and move of the Genioplasty.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with genial deformeties that require surgical correction.
  • Patients with chin asymmetry.
  • Patients older than 18 years old.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with uncontrolled systemic disease (Diabetes Mellitus).
  • Previous Radiotherapy to the area of interest.
  • Patients on bisphosphonates therapy.
  • Patients underwent previous or concomitant mandibular orthognathic surgery.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patients need genioplastyOsseous Genioplasty-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Accuracy Of the Custom Made Miniplateone year

Hausdorff function analysis (Topographic Color Mapping) by superimposition of both preoperative and postoperative computed tomography 3D scans and obtaining numerical values.

Data management and analysis will be performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) vs.21. Numerical data will be summarized using means and standard deviations or median and range as appropriate. Correlation analysis between Accuracy of computer assisted custom made plate and preoperative 3D virtual planning will be done using Pearson or Sperman rho as appropriate. Paired t test will be done and equivelance limit will be tested. All p- values are two sided. P- Values \<0.05 will be considered significant.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient Satisfaction (Esthetics)one year

Questionnaire with numerical scale ranging from minimal score ( number 1) to maximum score (number 10) in ascending manner where the minimal score indicated unpleasant or unsatisfactory result ( doesn't meet the patient expectation) and maximum score indicated satisfactory and pleasant result (fully meets patient satisfaction).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Cairo University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Manial, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath