MedPath

Community Medical Center, Continuous Quality Improvement Project, Rapid Sequence Intubation

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation
Intubation, Intratracheal
Checklist
Interventions
Other: Standard Care
Other: Intubation Checklist
Registration Number
NCT05505799
Lead Sponsor
Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ
Brief Summary

To assess the ongoing continuous quality improvement of rapid sequence intubation in our emergency department. Ongoing assessment will address standardization of the process and protocol driven measures that will improve the overall quality of the intervention.

Detailed Description

Continuous evaluation and improvement of airway performance in the Emergency Department (ED) is essential for achieving positive clinical outcomes and reducing the incidence of related adverse events. First-pass success (FPS) in Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) is the most commonly utilized metric for evaluation and allows for comparison across clinical environments. According to a variety of studies published over the last decade, including a large, multi-center systematic review and meta-analysis, the mean FPS rate (84%) has been used as an institutional benchmark for ED airway proficiency.

Unfortunately, many complications can arise during RSI, the incidence of which has remained high. These complications commonly lead to poor or life-threatening outcomes and include desaturation, hypotension, dysrhythmia, cardiac arrest, pneumothorax, dental trauma, and esophageal intubation. According to the 4th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anesthetists, it was determined that 30% of patients in the ED and 60% of patients in the ICU experiencing an airway related incident, suffered brain damage or death. The number of failed intubation attempts (3+) has been directly correlated with the an increased development of complications. Thus, establishing effective methods of decreasing the occurrence of failed attempts will result in an immediate reduction of unintended issues.

To maximize FPS and increase the safety of the procedure, it is essential to develop a tool to maximize efficacy. The introduction of checklists as a process improvement tool has been identified as a successful strategy for improving the effectiveness and quality of procedures throughout healthcare. Integration of a checklist in the RSI procedure will help to increase FPS rates and act as a method to aid in continuous evaluation and improvement of overall airway performance.

Although many airway performance improvement studies exist, our institution is unique in that we are a new Emergency Medicine (EM) Residency program that will be comprised of only post-graduate year 1 (PGY1) and post-graduate year 2 (PGY2) EM residents at the commencement of data collection. Furthermore, our clinical skills training process involves an integrative approach, pioneered by our interdisciplinary team of educators. Continuous evaluation of FPS and the incidence of RSI-related complications will allow for assessment of not only our quality improvement initiative, but of our educational methodology as well. Overall, implementation of quality and performance improvement strategies can mitigate the occurrence of adverse events and lead to improved health outcomes for our patients. This is of paramount importance to us as providers and to our community as a whole.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
700
Inclusion Criteria
  • Any patient undergoing endotracheal intubation in the Emergency department
Exclusion Criteria
  • Age < 18 years old

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SEQUENTIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PreinterventionStandard CareNormal clinician intubation process
PostinterventionIntubation ChecklistClinician intubation process after implementation and clinician education with a procedural checklist
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
First Pass Success RateAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where the trachea is successfully intubated on the first attempt

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Dental traumaAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where patients suffer dental trauma

Esophageal intubationAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where patients encounter esophageal intubation

Aspiration rateAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where patients suffer aspiration

Cardiac arrestAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where patients suffer cardiac arrest

Cuff LeakAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where the endotracheal tube experiences a cuff leak

DysrhythmiaAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where patients suffer dysrhythmia

Post procedural hypotensionAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where patients suffer hypotension in the immediate postprocedure period

LaryngospasmAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where patients suffer laryngospasm

Mainstem intubationAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where patients encounter a mainstem intubation

Unplanned extubationAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where patients encounter an unplanned extubation

HypoxemiaAt time of intubation

Proportion of intubations where patients suffer hypoxemia

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Community Medical Center

🇺🇸

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath