Comparision and evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of Etidronic acid and Propolis against E. faecalis in primary teeth: An in vivo study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 1 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Etidronic acid may have better antimicrobial property than Propolis as an irrigant in primary teeth
研究概览
简要总结
An interventional, double blinded, randomised parallel group trial willbe conducted in 30 teeth from the patients requiring pulpectomy of 3 to 8 yearsold after obtaining a written informed consent from the parents of child. 30 teeth requiring pulpectomy will be divided into two groups using followingirrigants: Group I (n=15 teeth): 9% Etidronic acid and Group II (n=15 teeth):Propolis. Appropriate local anesthesia will be given and the tooth will beisolated with rubber dam. The gross carious tissue will be removed and initialaccess opening will be done with No. 3 round carbide bur. Working length willbe determined with preoperative intraoral periapical radiograph. Firstmicrobiological sample will be obtained with 2 sterile absorbent paper pointseach for 30 seconds from the root canal (pre irrigation) and will beimmediately immersed into test tube with Brain Heart Infusion Broth (BHI).Conventional biomechanical preparation will be done upto 35 k-file. Duringinstrumentation after each file, Group I: 2 ml of 9% Etidronic acid for 20seconds will be used as an irrigant and Group II: 2 ml of Propolis for 20 seconds will be used as anirrigant. The activation of irrigants will be done with waterpik. Finalirrigation of canals will be done at the end of instrumentation and driedbefore obturating and second microbiological sample will be collected withanother 2 sterile absorbent paper points each for 30 seconds. The root canalwill be filled with a obturating material and a postoperative intraoral periapicalradiograph will be taken. The collected samples will be subjected tomicrobiological analysis to determine the number of colony forming unitsagainst E. faecalis. The obtained results will be subjected to statisticalanalysis.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- Double Blind Double Dummy
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 3.00 Year(s) 至 8.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients having optimum systemic health.
- •Primary teeth with atleast one necrotic pulp canal, abscess, or sinus tract.
- •Primary teeth with presence of radiolucency in furcation or periapical region.
- •Primary teeth with atleast two thirds of root present.
- •Sufficient tooth structure to support a rubber dam.
排除标准
- •Patient on antibiotics upto 2 weeks prior to the study or having any systemic illness.
- •Primary teeth which are non restorable,with pulpal floor or with mobility.
- •Primary teeth with less than two thirds present.
- •Teeth which doesnot support rubber dam application.
结局指标
主要结局
Etidronic acid may have better antimicrobial property than Propolis as an irrigant in primary teeth
时间窗: 1 year
次要结局
- Etidronic acid may be equally efficient to Propolis in antimicrobial activity as an irrigant in primary teeth(1 year)
