Identify the Most Effective Rehabilitation Method Between a Treatment with a Sensorized Treadmill (Walker View) and a Treatment with Conventional Group Therapy in Balance Disorders and the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Identify Predictive Indices to Prevent Falls and Diagnose Promptly the Risk
- Conditions
- Balance DisordersRehabilitationFallsFalls PreventionArtificial Intelligence (AI)Elderly (people Aged 65 or More)
- Registration Number
- NCT06649500
- Brief Summary
Falls in the elderly are one of the main sources of disability and hospitalization, with a significant impact on quality of life and social and healthcare costs. Falls represent a significant health concern for people over 60 years old. Numerous studies have shown that falls cause serious health consequences. Around 30% of people over the age of 60 experience a fall during the year.
According to the impact falls have, the investigators decided to analyze the effectiveness of training on a Walker View sensorized treadmill, with the possibility of exercises for coordination and balance, compared to training with a conventional group therapy, in order to understand the best training to reduce the risk of falling and observe the possible improvements in daily life activities.
So the study aims to identify the most effective rehabilitation method between a treatment with a sensorized treadmill (Walker View) and a conventional group therapy in balance disorders.
The study also aims to identify predictive indices, with the use of Artificial Intelligence, that can contribute to the prevention and diagnosis of balance disorders in a short time and prevent falls in the elderly.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 108
- Age ≥ 65 years
- Consent to participate in the study
- Positive history of balance disorders
- Absence of cognitive deficits (MMSE ≥ 24)
- Tinetti < 25
- Clinical pictures associated with musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, neuro-psychic problems and post-surgical outcomes that make the planned evaluation tests unfeasible.
- Inability to carry out a walking test.
- History of more than one fall in the last six months.
- Subjects who have not expressed informed consent to participate in the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Step Length of Gait Analysis Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks The Gait Analysis is used to assess individuals with conditions that affect their ability to walk. It is a useful test for studying gait, thanks to instruments that measure the load on each limb and walking in general. It allows us to evaluate progresses at different time frames.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Balance Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks Balance will be assessed through the Tinetti Scale, a validated tool to measure balance skills, including risk of falls and walking in elderly subjects.
Each item is given a score ranging from 0 to 2, where zero equals inability, 1 ability with aid or adaptation and 2 complete ability. A lower score indicates lower capabilities. A score \< or equal to 18 indicates high risk of falling, 19-24 indicates medium risk of falling, \> or equal to 25 low risk of falling.Mobility Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks Mobility is assessed through the Time Up and Go Test that measures the level of mobility and requires static and dynamic balancing skills to perform the test
Risk of falling Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks Risk of falling is assessed through the Berg Scale used to assess balance and the risk of falling. 14 items will be evaluated, each item assigns a score from 0 to 4 (with 0 = unable to perform the task, 4 = able to perform the task within the times and conditions indicated). Scores below 20 points indicate the need for the patient to use a wheelchair or aids; scores between 21 and 45 suggest using an aid when walking; scores above 45 suggest patients are able to move safely without the need of aids.
Daily Living Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks Daily Living is assessed with the Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living. It is an ordinal scale which measures a persons ability to complete activities of daily living (ADL) and it assesses functional independence. The scale assigns one point for each independent function in order to obtain a total performance result that varies from 0 (complete dependence) to 6 (independence in all functions).
Instrumental Activites of Daily Living Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks These activities will be assessed through the IADL scale and it respectively investigates the ability of elderly subjects to carry out fundamental functions of daily life. One point will be assigned for each independent function in order to obtain a total performance result that varies from 0 (complete dependence) to 8 (independence in all functions)
Muscle strength Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks This will be assessed with the Motricity Index which aims to measure muscle strength and motor skills at the limb level.
Patient reported Quality of Life Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks This will be assessed by the QoL scale SF-36. It measures 36 items in order to objectify to quantify health status and measure health-related quality of life. The aggregate scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, as a percentage, where the higher the score, the more favorable the health status.
Stability Baseline, 6 weeks, 10 weeks This outcome measure will be assessed with the stabilometric platform, which measures the average position of the body's centre of gravity and its small movements around that position.