Randomized Clinical Trial of Stoma Reversal Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs "Gunsight" Skin Incision and Closure Technique to Eliminate the Risk of Wound Infection
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 143
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- superficial wound infection of stoma site
研究概览
简要总结
The use of temporary stomas has been demonstrated to reduce septic complications after colorectal cancer surgery, especially in high-risk anastomosis; therefore, it is necessary to reduce the number of complications secondary to ostomy takedowns, namely wound infection. The aim of this study is to compare the rates of superficial wound infection, healing time and patient satisfaction after pursestring closure vs "gunsight" skin incision and closure technique closure.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •loop colostomy
- •end colostomy
排除标准
- •other stomy
研究组 & 干预措施
Pursestring Wound Closure group
use Pursestring Wound Closure technique to close the stoma
干预措施: Pursestring Wound Closure (Procedure)
Gunsight Skin Incision and Closure group
use Gunsight Skin Incision and Closure Technique to close the stoma
干预措施: Gunsight Skin Incision and Closure Technique (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
superficial wound infection of stoma site
时间窗: 1 year
次要结局
- Healing time after stoma reversal(1 year)
研究者
Zhen Jun Wang
Professor
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital