跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07623837
NCT07623837尚未招募不适用

Prospective Multicenter Observational Study for Clinical Validation of AI-Based Quantitative Eye Movement Analysis Using Smartphone-Recorded 9-Gaze Videos

THYROSCOPE INC.1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,000 人开始时间: 2026年7月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
1,000
试验地点
1
主要终点
Agreement between AI-derived and rater-derived corneal center displacement (distance, mm)

研究概览

简要总结

This prospective, multicenter, multinational observational study evaluates the clinical validity of an AI-based quantitative eye movement analysis system (Glandy EOM) that analyzes smartphone-recorded 9-gaze videos. Approximately 200 adults per site with suspected or confirmed ocular motility abnormalities will undergo a single study visit consisting of a standard clinical 9-gaze examination, an assistant-aided smartphone video recording, and a patient self-recorded video acquisition using a mobile application. Because the study population is defined by clinical suspicion or diagnosis of ocular motility abnormality rather than confirmed disease at enrollment, some participants may be clinically judged to have no abnormality on formal evaluation; such subjects remain part of the study population and are not considered healthy volunteers. AI-derived quantitative eye movement metrics (corneal center displacement in millimeters and angular deviation) will be compared with rater-derived measurements obtained from the same videos using a calibrated reference approach, and with clinician-assessed 9-gaze grading. The investigational device is used solely for video acquisition and analysis and does not influence clinical decision-making.

详细描述

Ocular motility is commonly evaluated using the 9-gaze examination, which relies on clinician observation and semi-quantitative grading. This approach is inherently subjective and can show inter-observer variability and limited sensitivity to subtle changes over time. Objective, quantitative assessment of eye movement remains an unmet clinical need, particularly for monitoring disease progression and treatment response.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence have enabled automated analysis of facial and ocular features from smartphone-recorded videos, offering the potential for reproducible quantitative measurement of eye movement. Glandy EOM is an investigational software-only medical device (SaMD) developed by THYROSCOPE INC. that processes smartphone-recorded 9-gaze videos to generate quantitative eye movement metrics. Glandy EOM has not yet received regulatory approval and is used for research purposes only in this study.

The study is a prospective, multicenter, multinational observational investigation designed to evaluate the clinical validity of Glandy EOM. The study population consists of adults with suspected or confirmed ocular motility abnormalities; healthy volunteers without any clinical indication for 9-gaze examination are not enrolled. Because eligibility is based on clinical suspicion or diagnosis of ocular motility abnormality rather than confirmed disease at enrollment, some participants may ultimately be clinically judged to have no abnormality on formal evaluation; such subjects remain part of the study population. Participants will undergo a single study visit consisting of (1) a standard clinical 9-gaze examination with clinician grading (-4 to +4), (2) a smartphone video recording performed with the assistance of a trained operator using a standardized setup, and (3) a patient self-recorded smartphone video acquired through the study mobile application.

For quantitative reference measurements, independent rater-derived measurements will be obtained from the recorded videos using a calibrated reference approach. A calibration marker of known size will be placed on the glabella during video acquisition to enable real-world scale estimation for the reference measurements. The calibration marker is used only for rater-based reference measurement and is not used by the AI algorithm.

The primary objective is to evaluate agreement between AI-derived quantitative eye movement metrics and rater-derived measurements of corneal center displacement, expressed as distance (mm) and angular deviation. Secondary objectives are to evaluate correlation between AI-derived metrics and clinician-assessed 9-gaze grading, and to evaluate whether AI-derived metrics obtained from patient self-recorded videos are comparable to those obtained from assistant-aided recordings. The investigational device is used solely for video acquisition and analysis and does not influence clinical decision-making during the study.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
22 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Adults who have reached the legal age of consent for research participation in the applicable jurisdiction.
  • •Subjects with suspected or known ocular motility abnormalities.
  • •Subjects who are able to understand and follow gaze instructions required for the 9-gaze examination, as judged by the investigator.
  • •Subjects who are able to undergo facial video recording using a smartphone.
  • •Subjects who provide written informed consent.

排除标准

  • •Conditions that prevent reliable detection of ocular landmarks in video recordings (e.g., severe ptosis, corneal opacity, or significant occlusion of the eyes).
  • •Ocular or facial conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, may significantly interfere with image-based analysis.
  • •Subjects who are unable to comply with study procedures.

研究组 & 干预措施

Ocular motility abnormality cohort (single cohort)

Adults with suspected or confirmed ocular motility abnormalities scheduled for clinical 9-gaze examination at participating ophthalmology sites. No separate healthy-volunteer control cohort is enrolled; some participants may ultimately be clinically judged to have no abnormality on formal evaluation but remain part of the study population.

干预措施: Glandy EOM (AI-based quantitative eye movement analysis software) (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Agreement between AI-derived and rater-derived corneal center displacement (distance, mm)

时间窗: At study visit (single visit)

Agreement between AI-derived and rater-derived measurements of corneal center displacement expressed as distance (mm) across 9 gaze positions, assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.

Agreement between AI-derived and rater-derived angular deviation (degrees)

时间窗: At study visit (single visit)

Agreement between AI-derived and rater-derived measurements of corneal center displacement expressed as angular deviation (degrees) across 9 gaze positions, assessed by ICC and Bland-Altman analysis.

Linear association and absolute error vs. rater-derived reference

时间窗: At study visit (single visit)

Linear association and absolute error between AI-derived and rater-derived measurements (both distance and angular deviation), assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient and mean absolute error (MAE), respectively.

次要结局

  • Correlation between AI-derived metrics (assistant-aided recording) and clinician-assessed 9-gaze grading(At study visit (single visit))
  • Correlation between AI-derived metrics (patient self-recorded) and clinician-assessed 9-gaze grading(At study visit (single visit))
  • Agreement between AI-derived metrics from patient self-recorded vs. assistant-aided recordings(At study visit (single visit))
  • Linear association and absolute error: patient self-recorded vs. assistant-aided(At study visit (single visit))

研究者

发起方
THYROSCOPE INC.
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验