跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02427425
NCT02427425已完成4 期

Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain

Federal University of São Paulo0 个研究点目标入组 71 人开始时间: 2010年6月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
71
主要终点
Change in pain assessed by visual analog scale

研究概览

简要总结

Introduction: Low back pain is one of the most common complaints in doctors' offices, and acute low back pain is characterized by episodes of pain with less than three weeks duration. The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), based on the gate control theory of pain proposed by Melzack and Wall in 1965, has been used as an adjunctive therapy in the control of back pain, being a non-invasive, low cost, safe and easy to apply. No studies were found regarding the effectiveness of TENS in acute low back pain.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of TENS in pain management of patients with acute low back pain.

Material and Methods: A randomized clinical trial, double-blinded and placebo-controlled. Patients were selected in the clinics of Federal de University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP) according to the following criteria: acute low back pain, both genders, aged between 18 and 65 years, pain between 4 and 8cm in pain numeric scale (PNS) and who agreed to participate in the study. After signing the informed consent patients were randomly allocated into one of the groups: TENS group (TG) or Placebo Group (PG). In TG was applied conventional TENS with frequency and intensity variation (FIV) effect, frequency of 100 hertz, a pulse width of 60μs and intensity adjusted according to the individual baseline for each patient without causing muscular contraction. The electrodes were arranged in a cross shape in the paravertebral region (levels T12-L1 and L5 - S1). In PG the same procedures were adopted, but did not occur electrical stimulus. Patients were informed that they could or could not feel electric shocks. Treatment consisted of 10 sessions (2x / week / 5 weeks), with each session lasting 30 '. Assessments were made at the following times: T0 (baseline), T1 to T10 (the beginning and end of each session), T11 (after the last session), T30 (30 days after the last session) and T60 (60 days after the last session). Assessment tools: PNS for pain, short-form 36 (SF-36), Roland-Morris, self-assessment of improvement ("Likert" scale) and drug consumption (daily).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • acute low back pain
  • both genders
  • aged between 18 and 65 years
  • pain between 4 and 8cm in PNS (pain numeric scale)
  • who agreed to participate in the study.

排除标准

  • Patients with pain of inflammatory, neoplastic or infectious origin,
  • with cardiac pacemaker,
  • previous back surgery,
  • signs of irritation of nerve roots,
  • vertebral fracture, which changed the physical activity in the last three months,
  • and pregnant women

结局指标

主要结局

Change in pain assessed by visual analog scale

时间窗: Baseline; 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10; 30 and 60 days

次要结局

  • Change in self-assessment of improvement assessed by a likert scale(Baseline; 10; 30 and 60 days)
  • Change in functional capacity assessed by the Roland Morris questionnaire(Baseline; 10; 30 and 60 days)
  • Change in Quality of life assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire(Baseline; 10; 30 and 60 days)
  • Change in Drug consumption assessed by the number of NSAIDs consumed(Baseline; 10; 30 and 60 days)

研究者

发起方
Federal University of São Paulo
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Vaneska da Graça Cruz Martinelli Lourenzi

Physiotherapist

Federal University of São Paulo

相似试验