Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01452867
NCT01452867
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of Ventilation With Bag-Valve-Mask, Laryngeal Tube S-D and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme

Krankenhaus Bruneck1 site in 1 country150 target enrollmentApril 2011

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cardiopulmonary Arrest
Sponsor
Krankenhaus Bruneck
Enrollment
150
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Airway Management time until first effective Ventilation
Status
Completed
Last Updated
14 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Inexperienced rescuers may encounter severe problems in an unconscious patient in opening and maintaining an upper airway patent. Gaining evidence which ventilation technique may be most efficient and safe is of utmost importance to potentially improve outcome during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Detailed Description

During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) ventilation has to be efficient to provide oxygen to the body and safe to avoid potentially fatal regurgitation and aspiration pneumonia and excessive stomach inflation. Basically trained rescuers have severe problems to ventilate a patient during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study intends to compare three commonly employed ventilation techniques. First, the traditionally bag-valve mask ventilation is commonly taught during CPR course, despite recent evidence suggesting low efficiency rates. Second, the laryngeal mask and the laryngeal tube supraglottic airways have shown high efficiency and safety in previous studies in the hand of experienced clinicians. Until now it is unclear if basically trained rescuers are better in ventilation with bag valve mask ventilation or the supraglottic airway devices, the laryngeal mask and the laryngeal tube. The purpose of this study is to compare in anesthetised patients airway management and ventilation with bag-valve mask, laryngeal mask and laryngeal tube.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2011
End Date
October 2011
Last Updated
14 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Krankenhaus Bruneck
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Gruber Elisabeth

Dr. med univ.

Krankenhaus Bruneck

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • \> 18 years old
  • elective surgery in general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient not sober
  • BMI \> 35kg/m2
  • Pathologies of cerebral spine or peripheral neurological deficit
  • Hiatus hernia, history of gastric reflux
  • Stomach or Esophagus -Operation in the medical history
  • Acute respiratory infection or obstructive lung disease
  • Non elective surgery
  • facial deformity

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Airway Management time until first effective Ventilation

Time Frame: 90 sec

Effective Ventilation within 90 Seconds required

Secondary Outcomes

  • Stomach inflation(60 sec)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials