Developing a Daily-use Fall Risk Assessment Device in Clinical Setting
- Conditions
- FallsBalance Assessment
- Registration Number
- NCT06767163
- Lead Sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Brief Summary
Study Objectives Objective 1: Compare the fall risk assessment results between balance sensors, traditional tests, and clinical diagnoses.
Objective 2: Improve the feasibility of using sensors to assess fall risk among older patients in the hospital.
The investigators select Hong Kong as the region for the experiment. Specifically, the community clinics and daytime hospitals are the actual onsite locations for experimenting. The specific venues of these locations need an electrical power supply and a flat ground for conducting the device test. Patients will be recruited for the development and testing of a device for fall risk assessment, study participants will be involved in balancing assessments, and questionnaire surveys, their medical records will be accessed. And during these tests and questionnaire surveys, the investigators will take photos, videos, and or audio recordings.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Older adults aged 60 years and above;
- Understand Cantonese or Mandarin or English;
- Clinical patients in the clinics.
- Unable to give written informed consent (e.g., illiterate or with cognitive impairment);
- Inability to stand for 30 seconds without any assistance.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Precision assessment of falling risk prediction six months A primary outcome is the precision assessment of falling risk prediction both from device and clinical diagnose.
The specific measurement variables for this primary outcome are the classification results of high/low falling risk based on the results (a composite result) of the device test and participants' actual falling incident indicators, including the number of falls, the severity of falling incidents after the device test, and medical history of the participants (eg. the history of the emergency, surgery, and diagnosed disease in the past three years), as well as the diagnosis results of the fall risk by clinical professionals. These results can be shown through the sensitivity and specificity analysis of the device evaluation.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Feasibility of fall risk assessment by using balance sensor in clinical settings six months The secondary outcome is the specific fall risk results given by the device and the participant's body data measurement, demographic information, and survey data about user experience and adoption.
Additionally, the ideas from clinical professionals on the better application of the device in hospitals will also be regarded as the secondary outcome of this study.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The University of Hong Kong
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡°Hong Kong, Hong Kong