Feasibility of Pediatric CIMT by Televideo
- Conditions
- Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
- Interventions
- Other: Pediatric Constrained Induced Movement Therapy
- Registration Number
- NCT05303883
- Lead Sponsor
- Ohio State University
- Brief Summary
The study will test a remotely delivered, intensive, therapist-led, pediatric CIMT intervention, to improve the quality and frequency of upper limb movement during functional activity. We will evaluate: remote assessment of patient motor outcomes; computer-based video interaction for parent training in shaping therapeutic activities; child, parent, and therapist interactions; remote delivery of treatment; and the usability and usefulness of technology (e.g. reliability of internet connection; video streaming). As a final product, the study will yield a feasible and acceptable tele-rehabilitation protocol that meets our fidelity and reliability criteria and is ready for larger-scale efficacy testing in children with hemiplegic CP, ages 1-10 years.
- Detailed Description
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a public health problem that affects 2-3 per 1000 children. Up to 75 % of children with cerebral palsy will have motor impairments that can lead to lifelong disability, therefore there is a need for effective treatment of these motor impairments. A body of evidence shows that intensive motor therapies can improve arm and hand (upper limb) motor function in children with CP. Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) is one of the motor therapies with the strongest evidence base for its effectiveness. Our team has developed an innovative CIMT protocol to treat upper limb impairments due to CP. This protocol combines 1) high dosage of motor treatments, (up to 3-6 hours of therapy per day for 20 days); 2) constraint of the unaffected arm, 3) the incorporation of behavior motivation techniques to encourage the child to perform increasingly complex motor tasks; 4) treatment within the home to promote generalization of the motor behaviors; and 5) a post-therapy treatment plan for the parents to continue after the formal CIMT protocol is done. In a recent randomized controlled trial, we tested the effect of this CIMT protocol on upper limb function in children with hemiplegic CP. Children who received CIMT at the 30-hour and 60-hour doses had significantly better function immediately post-treatment than children who received usual and customary care. This difference persisted at 6 months after treatment for the children who received the 60-hour dose. These results provide clear evidence that the higher therapy dose resulted in greater sustained improvement of upper limb function.
Through our work in this and other clinical trials, we recognized that our treatment protocol delivered in the home cannot be delivered to children who live in rural areas beyond the reach of our therapists or in urban communities whose families are unable to have therapists work in their homes for 20 days. This limitation disproportionately affects families who live in medically resource poor areas. To address this barrier to access, we propose to modify our CIMT protocol so it can be used for telehealth delivery. Rehabilitation by telehealth has drawn considerable attention in the adult stroke world. A small number of trials in adult stroke patients and a small pilot trial in pediatric patients with upper limb weakness have shown that upper limb rehabilitation by telehealth is feasible and can be as effective as that delivered in the clinic.
Based on this emerging evidence, we will test the feasibility of our CIMT protocol adapted for telerehabilitation. In a related study, we will refine our CIMT by soliciting the input of families and children who have undergone CIMT treatment, and the input of expert treating therapists and assessors regarding our protocol. In the current study, we will test this refined protocol in a pilot sample of five to seven children ages 1-10 years who have hemiplegic CP. We will evaluate whether the remotely delivered treatment maintains fidelity to the original version delivered in person; whether the treatment is feasible to deliver, and whether it is acceptable to families, therapists, and assessors. In addition, we will evaluate whether the remote assessment of fine and gross motor skills is feasible, reliable, and acceptable. These measures will be assessed by questionnaires, observation of assessment recordings, scoring of the outcome measure, and interviews of parents of and participating children (the primary stakeholders), as well as feedback from study assessors.
Our long-term goal is to implement effective, accessible, intensive upper-limb interventions for children with hemiparesis, using delivery methods that are accessible, available, and feasible for families representing socioeconomic, geographic, and racial/ethnic diversity. This clinical research study is an important step toward clinical implementation through translation of an evidence-based intervention to a potentially more accessible, practical and equitable delivery method for families of children with CP.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 12
- ages 1 - 10 years old at enrollment;
- diagnosis of hemiplegic CP per parent report;
- ability to participate in therapy 3 hours/day x 5 days/week x 4 weeks (dose based on CHAMP RCT results).
- uncontrolled seizures;
- medical or other complex conditions that preclude tolerance of 3 hours of intensive therapy per day
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Pediatric constraint induced therapy Pediatric Constrained Induced Movement Therapy Constrained induced therapy for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Three hours of therapy per day, for five days a week, for four weeks.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Within 2 weeks of intervention completion The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) will assess intervention feasibility with a four-item measure. The measure includes four statements about the plausibility of implementing the intervention (the intervention seems implementable; the intervention seems doable; the intervention seems possible; the intervention seems easy to use). Individuals rate the extent to which the agree with each statement on a five-level scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree).
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Within 2 weeks of intervention completion Acceptability of Intervention will be assessed through a four-item measure (AIM). The measure includes four statements about the appeal of the intervention (e.g. I like the intervention; I welcome the intervention; the intervention meets my approval; the intervention is appealing to me). Individuals rate the extent to which the agree with each statement on a five-level scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree).
Fidelity of Intervention Assessment Once per week during 4-week intervention period This instrument assesses the extent to which the therapist adhered to fifteen core constructs of the intervention protocol. Evidence of adherence to high quality pediatric rehabilitation elements includes 6 constructs that are scored as Present (present-some and present-strong) or Absent. Includes items such as "collaboration between parent and therapist" and "aligning therapy with child's goals". Evidence of core components of pediatric constraint induced movement therapy is scored as Present or Absent. Includes items such as "high intensity of intervention" and occurs in "natural environment". Total score is number of core components present.
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Within 2 weeks of intervention completion Intervention Appropriateness will be assessed through a four-item measure (IAM). The measure includes four statements about the relevance or pertinence of the intervention (e.g. the intervention seems suitable; the intervention seems applicable; the intervention seems fitting; the intervention seems like a good match). Individuals rate the extent to which the agree with each statement on a five-level scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree).
Usefulness, Usability and Desirability Assessment (UUD) Within 2 weeks of intervention completion The Usability of the remote delivery system (use of the iPad, Kubi robot; video upload) will be assessed with the UUD assessment. Usability includes three major components: usefulness, desirability, and usability. The UUD gathers data on usability (ease of use of the telehealth technology) (9 items), usefulness (value, relevance, and applicability of the telehealth technology) (10 items), and desirability (overall appeal or interest of the telehealth technology) (4 items). Items are rated a five-point Likert-type scale.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Fidelity of Remote Assessment Within one week following the assessment Fidelity to remote assessment procedures will be determined through video coding of recorded remote assessment. The following will be coded: adherence to administration procedures, length of assessment, number of sessions to complete assessment, number of assessment items completed, and percentage of items completed.
Perceptions of Remote Assessment and Intervention Within one week following the intervention. A semi-structured interview will be used to assess the perceptions of therapists, assessors, and parents about the process of remote delivery. There are fourteen open-ended questions about the remote assessment process, the remote intervention process, and the technology used to gather information and conduct the remote assessments and intervention. These will will be coded qualitatively and analyzed by content analysis to determine common perceptions of strengths and areas for improvement.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Nationwide Children's Hospital
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
🇺🇸Roanoke, Virginia, United States
The Ohio State University
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States