Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02046083
NCT02046083
Unknown
Phase 2

Peanut Oral Induction Tolerance in Peanut's Allergic Teenagers

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: July 2013Last updated:
ConditionsPeanut Allergy
Interventionsarachid
Drugsarachid

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Percentage of patients which tolerate the cumulative dose of 2 grams of peanut at the end of the first phase of 24 weeks between treatment and placebo groups

Overview

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of the protocol is to evaluate the efficacy of a protocol for induction of tolerance to peanut ingestion increasing doses. The secondary purpose is to determine the interest of a prolonged maintenance therapy

Detailed Description

Prospective randomized double blind, placebo controlled, protocol in two phases: 1/ active treatment versus placebo for induction phase; 2/ long versus short maintenance

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
12 Years to 18 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adolescents between 12 and 18 years
  • Clinical History of allergic manifestation within one hour of ingestion of peanuts or Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges (DBPCFCs) peanut positive below the threshold of 2 grams
  • Bad reaction peanut demonstrated by positive Patch Test (PT ≥ 3 mm above the negative control) and specific IgE f13\> 12 IU / mL and / or rAra h2\> 5.8 IU / mL
  • Previous follow at least 1 year

Exclusion Criteria

  • Lack of response during the initial DBPCFCs to the cumulative dose of 2 grams of peanut or instant dose of 1 gram of peanut
  • Uncontrolled asthma and / or severe over the previous year
  • Atopic dermatitis uncontrolled
  • Initial severe anaphylaxis requiring hospitalization in intensive care
  • Presence of a major allergy with anaphylaxis at another allergen risk (milk, egg, nuts, or other)
  • Home away from a center could support a severe reaction in emergency
  • Lack of motivation and understanding of parents and / or child
  • Incapacity
  • to establish a daily logbook of clinical monitoring
  • to support severe reaction after eating peanut

Arms & Interventions

treatment

Experimental

Prospective randomized double blind, placebo controlled, protocol in two phases: 1/ active treatment versus placebo for induction phase; 2/ long versus short maintenance

Intervention: arachid (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of patients which tolerate the cumulative dose of 2 grams of peanut at the end of the first phase of 24 weeks between treatment and placebo groups

Time Frame: at 24 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

  • Percentage of patients which tolerate the cumulative dose of 2 grams of peanut during a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges (DBPCFCs) after 24 weeks without traces eviction diet after the end of maintenance phase(at 24 weeks)
  • Percentage of patients had quadrupled their tolerance to peanut at the end of induction phase(at 24 weeks)
  • Percentage of patients with adverse effects during induction phase(at 24 weeks)
  • Modifications of the immune profile showing a desensitization to peanut(at 24 weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials