跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07633925
NCT07633925尚未招募不适用

Short-term Results of SuperPATH Versus Direct Lateral Approach In Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Assiut University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2026年7月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
100
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has shown great success in relieving joint pain and disability and has been a procedure of choice for the treatment of end-stage degenerative joint diseases and trauma.

There are multiple surgical approaches for THA, including the traditional posterior approach, anterior approach, lateral approach, anterolateral approach and posterolateral approach; each has its advantages and complications.

Modified direct lateral approach is considered as standard, most commonly used and familiar in Assiut university Arthroplasty centre. Yet it may cause abductor weakness, post operative pain, prolonged rehabilitation time and more blood loss.

In the past two decades, the group of micro-posterior approaches was introduced. In 2004 Stephen Murphy developed the Supecapsular (SuperCap) approach, preparing the hip insitu to reduce soft tissue traumatization caused by the dislocation manoeuvre used in the conventional posterior approach. , In 2008 Brad Penenberg developed the percutaneously-assisted total hip (PATH) app, a tissue-sparing approach leading through the interval between gluteus medius and the conjoined tendon of the external rotators.

In2011, James Chow described the supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach, the most Important features of SuperPATH are the following: (a) muscle sparing between gluteus medius and piriformis without detaching external rotator tendons or disrupting the hip capsule, (b) femur preparation first without dislocation (c) percutaneous acetabular preparation.

SuperPATH approach is designed to reduce soft tissue trauma and so blood loss, post operative pain, improve joint stability and allow earlier mobilization of patients.

Despite the theoretical advantages of the SuperPATH approach, its adoption remains limited compared with conventional surgical approaches. Furthermore, there is ongoing debate regarding its clinical superiority in terms of functional outcomes, complication rates and implant position.

Aim of our study is to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of total hip arthroplasty performed using SuperPATH compared to modified direct lateral approach.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Radomization will be preoperative for patients But the patient who do the operation and the surgeon will know the approach that will be used Outcome assessor will be masked

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Primary total hip arthroplasty.
  • Age > 18 years.
  • Body mass index < 40 kg/m
  • Able to ambulate preoperative.

排除标准

  • Hip deformity (acetabular or femoral).
  • Ankylosed hips.
  • Severe osteoporosis.
  • Neuromuscular disorders.

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Islam Mohamed Abd El Hameed

Assistant lecturer

Assiut University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验