Assessment of Coronary Artery Lesion Using Optical Coherence Tomography Versus IntraVascular Ultrasound for BiorEsorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation
Not Applicable
Terminated
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Registration Number
- NCT02814578
- Lead Sponsor
- Young-Hak Kim, MD, PhD
- Brief Summary
The primary objective is to determine whether IVUS- (vs. OCT-) guided BVS implantation is non-inferior to achieve a large in-scaffold minimal lumen area (primary endpoint) measured by OCT at 1-year follow-up.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 9
Inclusion Criteria
- Age 20 years or older
- Patients who have at least one epicardial coronary artery lesion with an evidence of inducible ischemia
- Willing and able to provide informed written consent
- Eligible for PCI
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients presenting with STEMI within 2 weeks
- Bypass graft lesion
- Lesion with left main disease
- Expected length of scaffold > 40 mm
- Bifurcation lesion requiring side branch stenting
- Small vessels < 2.75 mm
- Stented lesion
- Suspected coronary spasm even after sufficient nitrate injected
- Cases in which the IVUS or OCT imaging catheter failed to cross the lesion
- Poor quality IVUS or OCT images
- Contraindication to dual anti-platelet therapy
- Chronic total occlusion
- Angiographically large-sized vessel (>3.5mm of reference lumen diameter)
- Life expectancy shorter than 2 years
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method OCT-measured in-scaffold minimal lumen area 1 year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method OCT-measured minimal scaffold area (MSA) 1 year OCT-measured mean scaffold expansion 1 year
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What is the non-inferiority of IVUS-guided vs. OCT-guided BVS implantation in NCT02814578 for CAD?
How do IVUS and OCT compare in predicting neointimal coverage after BVS implantation in CAD?
Which biomarkers correlate with scaffold healing in IVUS vs. OCT-guided BVS procedures?
What adverse events are associated with IVUS or OCT-guided BVS implantation and their management?
How does BVS performance under IVUS guidance compare to metallic stents in CAD treatment?
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Asan Medical Center
🇰🇷Seoul, Songpa-Gu, Korea, Republic of
Pusan National University Hospital
🇰🇷Pusan, Korea, Republic of
Ulsan University Hospital
🇰🇷Ulsan, Korea, Republic of
Asan Medical Center🇰🇷Seoul, Songpa-Gu, Korea, Republic of