GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial Product Study
- Conditions
- Hernia, HiatalHernia, VentralHernia, DiaphragmaticIncisional Hernia
- Interventions
- Device: Gore ENFORM Biomaterial (Preperitoneal)Device: Gore ENFORM Biomaterial (Intraperitoneal)
- Registration Number
- NCT04718168
- Lead Sponsor
- W.L.Gore & Associates
- Brief Summary
A prospective, retrospective, non-randomized, multicenter study with two independent hernia study cohorts (Ventral / Incisional Hernia Repair and Diaphragmatic / Hiatal Hernia Repair). The primary objective of this study is to collect GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial product commercial-use data on device functional performance and short-term patient experience.
- Detailed Description
A prospective, retrospective, non-randomized, multicenter study with two independent hernia study cohorts (Ventral / Incisional Hernia Repair and Diaphragmatic / Hiatal Hernia Repair). The primary objective of this study is to collect GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial product commercial-use data on device functional performance and long-term follow up.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 245
The subject is / has:
- At least 18 years old at the time of informed consent. Minimum age required by state regulations (as applicable).
- An expected scored Class I (Clean) surgical wound using CDC Surgical Wound Classification system.
- A planned implant with GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial for a single site ventral or hiatal hernia repair as suture line reinforcement.
- An expected scored Grade 1 or Grade 2 using the Ventral Hernia Working Group Grading system.
- Willing to provide informed consent and comply with follow-up requirements.
Pre-procedure
The subject is / has:
- Treated in another drug or medical device study within 1 year of study enrollment.
- Implanted with GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial in the reconstruction of cardiovascular defects.
- Hernia repair expected to be performed as part of a bridged procedure (i.e., expected inability to perform primary closure of fascia or crura, patients requiring permanent support from the device).
- A BMI >40.
- Evidence of a systemic infection.
- Cirrhosis or undergoing dialysis.
- A wound-healing disorder.
- Immunocompromised such as, with HIV or transplant, or receiving chemo or radiation therapy.
- Expected to undergo mesh implantation in conjunction with any bariatric procedure and / or panniculectomy procedure.
- A stoma.
- Co-morbid conditions that may limit their ability to comply with study and follow-up requirements.
- Positive pregnancy or lactation status as confirmed by site standard of care.
- Hernias requiring treatment within multiple body regions or expected use of multiple hernia mesh devices.
Post-procedure Inclusion Criteria
At the time of index procedure, the subject is / has:
- At least 18 years old. Minimum age required by state regulations (as applicable).
- Implanted with GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial for a single site ventral or hiatal hernia repair as suture-line reinforcement on or before 365 days prior to site protocol amendment 3 approval date.
- Unless there is an Informed Consent waiver issued by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), an Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by subject.
Post-procedure Exclusion Criteria
At the time of index procedure, the subject is / has:
- Treated in another drug or medical device study within 1 year of study enrollment.
- Implanted with GORE® ENFORM Biomaterial in the reconstruction of cardiovascular defects.
- Hernia repair that was performed as part of a bridged procedure (i.e., inability to perform primary closure of fascia or crura, patients requiring permanent support from the device).
- A BMI >40.
- Evidence of a systemic infection.
- Cirrhosis or undergoing dialysis.
- A wound-healing disorder.
- Immunocompromised such as, with HIV or transplant, or receiving chemo or radiation therapy.
- Underwent mesh implantation in conjunction with any bariatric procedure and / or panniculectomy procedure.
- A stoma.
- Co-morbid conditions that may limit their ability to comply with study and follow-up requirements.
- Positive pregnancy or lactation status as confirmed by site standard of care.
- Hernias requiring treatment within multiple body regions or expected use of multiple hernia mesh devices.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Hiatal/Diaphragmatic Hernia - Preperitoneal ENFORM Biomaterial Gore ENFORM Biomaterial (Preperitoneal) - Ventral/Incisional Hernia - Intraperitoneal ENFORM Biomaterial Gore ENFORM Biomaterial (Intraperitoneal) - Hiatal/Diaphragmatic Hernia-Intraperitoneal ENFORM Biomaterial Gore ENFORM Biomaterial (Intraperitoneal) - Ventral/Incisional Hernia - Preperitoneal ENFORM Biomaterial Gore ENFORM Biomaterial (Preperitoneal) -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Hernia Recurrence - Primary Device Endpoint Through 24 months Clinical diagnosed hernia recurrence in the area of the initial hernia repair (within device overlap at time of index procedure).
Incidence of SSOPI - Primary Procedural Endpoint 3 First Post-Procedural Visit (Days 1-45) Incidence of SSOPI, reported as a composite and individually.
Incidence of SSI - Primary Procedural Endpoint 1 First Post-Procedural Visit (Days 1-45) Incidence of SSI, reported as a composite and individually.
Incidence of SSO - Primary Procedural Endpoint 2 First Post-Procedural Visit (Days 1-45) Incidence of SSO, reported as a composite and individually.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Freedom from potential device-related SAEs - Secondary endpoint 1 Through 24 months Freedom from potential device-related Serious Adverse Events will be reported descriptively with no formal goals or hypothesis.
Change in Quality of Life in Carolinas Comfort Scale - Secondary Endpoint 3 Through 24 months For ventral hernia subjects; change in Quality of Life in Carolinas Comfort Scale as measured by a change in total score of the Carolinas Comfort Scale Quality of Life questionnaire given at follow-up visits.
Minimum Total Score is 0 and maximum Total Score is 115. Lower score means better outcome.Relief from GERD Symptoms - Secondary Endpoint 4 Through 24 months For diaphragmatic hernia subjects; relief from GERD symptoms as measured by a decrease in the total score of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire given at follow-up visits.
Total Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to questions 1-15. Greatest possible score (worst symptoms) = 75 Lowest possible score (no symptoms) = 0
Heartburn Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to questions 1-6. Worst heartburn symptoms = 30 No heartburn symptoms = 0 Scores of ≤ 12 with each individual question not exceeding 2 indicate heartburn elimination.
Regurgitation Score: Calculated by summing the individual scores to questions 10-15.
Worst regurgitation symptoms = 30 No regurgitation symptoms = 0 Scores of ≤ 12 with each individual question not exceeding 2 indicate regurgitation elimination.Re-intervention at study-treated location - Secondary Endpoint 2 Through 24 months Surgical re-intervention in the area of the hernia repaired initially (e.g. drain insertion, infection, surface issues, second operation, etc.) will be reported descriptively with no formal goals or hypothesis.
Trial Locations
- Locations (9)
University of California - San Diego
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States
Prisma Health - Upstate
🇺🇸Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Sarasota Memorial HealthCare System
🇺🇸Sarasota, Florida, United States
Northshore University Health System Research Institute
🇺🇸Evanston, Illinois, United States
University of Kentucky
🇺🇸Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Atrium Health
🇺🇸Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
🇺🇸Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houson
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States