MedPath

Feasibility Study of Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgical Staging for Endometrial Cancer

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Endometrial Cancer
Interventions
Procedure: Four-port laparoscopic surgical staging
Procedure: single-port laparoscopic surgical staging
Registration Number
NCT01679522
Lead Sponsor
Asan Medical Center
Brief Summary

To compare the feasibility, safety, and efficacy between single-port and four-port laparoscopic surgical staging in patients with early stage endometrial cancer.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
107
Inclusion Criteria
  • Previously untreated, histologically confirmed endometrial cancer

  • Presumed FIGO stage 1

  • Endometrioid adenocarcinoma

  • patient who is planned to undergo surgical staging

  • adequate oran function

    1. WBC > 3000 cells/mcl
    2. Platelets > 100000/mcl
    3. Creatinine < 2.0 mg/dL
    4. Bilirubin < 1.5 * normal and SGOT or SGPT < 3 * normal
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I-II

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2

  • Patients who have signed an approved Informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria
  • Uncontrolled medical disease
  • Active infectious disease requiring antibiotics
  • Previous pelvic radiation therapy
  • Pregnant and lactating woman
  • Patient who requires additional surgical procedures which are not necessary for surgical staging of endometrial cancer

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Four-port surgery groupFour-port laparoscopic surgical stagingFour-port laparoscopic surgical staging including total hysterectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, and/or bilateral salpingooophorectomy, and/or para-aortic lymph node dissection
Single-port surgery groupsingle-port laparoscopic surgical stagingSingle-port laparoscopic surgical staging including total hysterectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, and/or bilateral salpingooophorectomy, and/or para-aortic lymph node dissection
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
operating time1 day (Immediately after operation)

Total operation time and time required for each procedure are calculated and compared.

Number of lymph nodes retrieved1 week after surgery

The number of right pelvic lymph nodes and left pelvic lymph nodes were obtained and compared.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
transfusion requirement and amountwithin 1 week after surgery

Investigate and compare blood transfusion volume and frequency during and after surgery.

Postoperative painwithin 1 week after surgery

The VAS pain score was obtained every 8 hours after surgery and compared.

Postoperative analgesics requirementwithin 1 week after surgery

If the VAS pain score is 3 or more or the patient desires, additional pain medication is administered. The frequency of the pain medication administered in this way is investigated and compared.

postoperative complicationswithin 1 month after surgery

Compare the frequency of fever, urinary retention, anemia, and nausea after surgery.

recurrence free survival34 months after surgery

Compare RFS during the follow-up period.

overall survival34 months after surgery

Compare OS during the follow-up period.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath