Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00309972
NCT00309972CompletedPhase 3

A Randomized Phase III Trial of Sequential Chemotherapy Followed By Radical Radiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy Followed by Chemotherapy in Patients With Inoperable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Good Performance Status

University College, London2 sites in 1 country130 target enrollmentStarted: December 2005Last updated:
Conditions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Enrollment
130
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Treatment related mortality (any cause)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin and vinorelbine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. It is not yet known whether giving combination chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy is more effective than giving combination chemotherapy together with radiation therapy followed by more chemotherapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying combination chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy to see how well it works compared to combination chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy followed by more chemotherapy in treating patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer that cannot be removed by surgery.

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Compare the overall survival of patients with stage III non-small cell cancer treated with chemotherapy comprising cisplatin and vinorelbine ditartrate (CV) followed by radical radiotherapy versus concurrent CV chemoradiotherapy followed by CV chemotherapy.

Secondary

  • Compare the progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the local progression-free survival (local control).
  • Compare the hematological, pulmonary, esophageal, and neurological toxicities.
  • Compare the response.
  • Compare the quality of life.
  • Compare the cost-effectiveness.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Treatment related mortality (any cause)

Time Frame: from randomization till death

Secondary Outcomes

  • Cost effectiveness(at baseline, every 3 weeks for the first 6 months, then 3 monthly until 2 years, 6 monthly until 3 years, and annually thereafter)
  • Hematological, pulmonary, esophageal, and neurological toxicities(From randomisation to the first 6 months)
  • Quality of life(at baseline, every 3 weeks for the first 6 months, then 3 monthly until 2 years, 6 monthly until 3 years, and annually thereafter)
  • Overall survival and progression-free survival.(Overall Survival is the time between date of randomisation and date of death of any cause. Progression-free survival will be calculated from the date of randomisation to the date of first clinical evidence of progressive disease, or death.)
  • Local progression-free survival (local control)(From the date of randomisation to the date of first clinical evidence of progressive disease at the primary site, or death)
  • Response(proportion of patients in each treatment group whose best response in the first 6 months from randomisation is complete or partial will be reported.)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials