IRCT20180121038465N1
Recruiting
Phase 2
The Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with buccal and sublingual Misoprostol in Labor Induction in Term Pregnancy
Conditionsinduction of labour.
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- induction of labour.
- Sponsor
- Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
- Enrollment
- 300
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •single, bishop score\=4, cephalic presentation, NST reactive, parity \=2, gestational age more than 37 w, Amniotic fluid index \=5
Exclusion Criteria
- •maternal medical diseases
- •breech presentation
- •fetal anomaly
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 2
Effect of sublingual Misoprostol versus vaginal Misoprostol in labor induction success.labour induction.Precipitate labourIRCT138903121096N3Vice chancellor for research -Guilan university of medical sciences126
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of oral misoprostol with vaginal prostin for induction of labour at term with prolonged rupture of membranesPregnancy and Childbirth: Labour inductionPregnancy and ChildbirthISRCTN57744215Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2004 Update - Department of Health (UK)200
Completed
Phase 3
Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for legal abortioMedical abortion.termination of pregnancyIRCT2014110812789N9Vice Chancellor for Research, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences70
Completed
Not Applicable
A comparison of vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol and nitric oxide donor for termination of pregnancy at 13 to 29 weeks. A prospective randomised trialISRCTN44341343Farhat Hached University Teaching Hospital (Tunisia)70
Completed
Phase 3
A comparison of vaginal misoprostol and vaginal evening primrose oilSpontaneous abortion.Genital tract and pelvic infection following incomplete spontaneous abortionO03.0IRCT20201218049749N1Kashan University of Medical Sciences72