Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00431158
NCT00431158CompletedNot Applicable

ARDSnet Protocol vs. the Open Lung Approach for the Ventilatory Management of Severe, Established ARDS: A Global Randomized Controlled Trial

Massachusetts General Hospital1 site in 1 country224 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2007Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
224
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
60 day mortality

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Many patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome or ARDS need breathing support that is provided by a machine called a ventilator or respirator. The purpose of this study is to find out if a new method of setting the ventilator for patients with severe ARDS is better than the standard, commonly used way of setting the ventilator.

Detailed Description

The ARDSnet protocol is the current, standard of care for ARDS. Mechanical ventilation is managed using low tidal volumes, relatively high respiratory rates, with oxygenation managed according to PEEP and FIO2 relationships as defined in a table. This study compares the ARDSnet protocol with an open lung approach to mechanical ventilation. The open lung approach uses a technique to recruit collapsed lung areas and then uses the lowest PEEP level that prevents recollapse of recruited lung units. The best PEEP level is determined by a decremental PEEP trial involving a series of pressure measurements taken after the recruitment maneuver. Both the ARDSnet protocol and the open lung approach require low tidal volumes and plateau pressures.

Evidence suggests that using a mechanical ventilation strategy of recruitment maneuvers (to open the collapsed lung) followed by high PEEP (to prevent collapse of the opened lung) with control of transpulmonary pressure through lower plateau pressures would maximize homogeneity within the lung and as such, minimize shearing forces in the lung parenchyma, thus improving ventilation and outcome in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Intubated and mechanically ventilated
  • •Diagnosis of ARDS using American-European consensus criteria
  • •Enrollment in study < 48 hours since diagnosis of ARDS
  • •For 12-36 hrs. (ideally 12-24 hrs) after diagnosis of ARDS, patient must be ventilated as follows: Volume A/C, Tidal volume of 4-8 ml/kg PBW, Plateau pressure ≤ 30 cmH2O, PEEP/FIO2 adjustments using ARDSnet table, Ventilator rate to keep PaCO2 = 35-60 mmHg
  • •During the 12-36 hour(ideally 12-24 hr) period, PaO2/FIO2 must remain < 200 mm Hg for an ABG obtained 30 minutes after placement on the following specific ventilator settings: Volume A/C, Tidal volume = 6 ml/kg PBW, Plateau pressure ≤ 30 cmH2O, Inspiratory time ≤ 1 second, PEEP ≥ 10 cmH2O, FIO2 ≥ 0.5, Ventilator rate to keep PaCO2 = 35-60 mmHg
  • •No lung recruitment maneuvers or adjunct therapy.
  • •Total time on mechanical ventilation < 96 hrs. at time of randomization.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Age < 18 years or > 80 years
  • •Weight < 35 kg PBW
  • •Body mass index > 60
  • •Intubated 2° to acute exacerbation of a chronic pulmonary disease
  • •Acute brain injury (ICP > 18 mmHg)
  • •Immunosuppression 2° to chemo- or radiation therapy
  • •Severe cardiac disease(one of the following): New York Heart Association Class 3 or 4, acute coronary syndrome or persistent ventricular tachyarrhythmias
  • •Positive laboratory pregnancy test
  • •Sickle cell disease
  • •Neuromuscular disease
  • •High risk of mortality within 3 months from cause other than ARDS, e.g. cancer
  • •More than 2 organ failures (not including pulmonary system)
  • •Documented lung barotrauma, i.e. chest tube placement other than for fluid drainage
  • •Persistent hemodynamic instability or intractable shock
  • •Penetrating chest trauma
  • •Enrollment in another interventional study

Arms & Interventions

2

Active Comparator

OLA Protocol

Intervention: Different Mechanical Ventilation Protocols (Other)

1

Active Comparator

ARDSnet Protocol

Intervention: Different Mechanical Ventilation Protocols (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

60 day mortality

Time Frame: 60 days

Secondary Outcomes

  • 365 day mortality(365 days)
  • Lung function 6 months after discharge(6 months)
  • Lung function 12 months after discharge(12 months)
  • Need for rescue therapy(Duration of hospital stay)
  • 28 day mortality(28 days)
  • Hospital mortality(Duration of hospital stay)
  • Ventilator free days(Hospital stay)
  • Incidence of barotrauma(Duration of hospital stay)
  • Ventilation associated pneumonia rate(Duration of hospital stay)
  • 180 day mortality(180 days)
  • Duration of hospitalization(Duration of hospital stay)
  • ICU mortality(Duration of ICU stay)
  • Length of ICU stay(Duration of ICU stay)
  • Development of extra-pulmonary organ failures(Duration of hospital stay)
  • Systemic inflammatory mediator levels(Duration of hospital stay)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Robert M. Kacmarek

Professor of Anesthesia, Director of Respiratory Care Services

Massachusetts General Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials