Penicillin Allergy Testing in STD Clinics
- Conditions
- Penicillin Allergy
- Interventions
- Drug: Direct Oral challengeDrug: Penicillin Major Determinant (PrePen) Skin Testing
- Registration Number
- NCT04620746
- Lead Sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Brief Summary
Demonstration project to implement penicillin allergy testing in STD outpatients using a questionnaire and pen allergy testing
- Detailed Description
all subjects receive risk questionnaire For subjects without high risk responses, randomized to direct oral challenge or PCN skin testing followed by oral challenge
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 284
- Prior history of PCN allergy
- No immunodeficiency or contraindication to skin testing
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Direct Oral Challenge Direct Oral challenge These subjects with reported PCN allergy and low risk responses will bypass skin testing and have direct oral challenge with amoxicillin Skin Testing Arm Penicillin Major Determinant (PrePen) Skin Testing These subjects with reported PCN allergy and reported low risk responses will receive skin testing followed by oral challenge Skin Testing Arm Direct Oral challenge These subjects with reported PCN allergy and reported low risk responses will receive skin testing followed by oral challenge
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Respondents Who Responded YES to Any Question Defining High Risk Penicillin Allergy Using Questionnaire Developed by the Study Baseline Used yes/no questionnaire designed by study team. Any positive response on the high-risk history was grounds for exclusion from randomization to allergy testing arm
Safety of Direct Oral Challenge Defined by Number of Subjects Who Did Not Have Pre-defined Changes in Vital Signs or Pre-defined Emergence of New Respiratory or Skin Symptoms After Oral Challenge 30 minutes after intervention Safety was determined by the presence or absence of adverse reactions. Symptoms assessed included pruritis, flushing, shortness of breath. Physical examination included vital signs, blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate and peak expiratory flow
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Provider Assessment of Feasibility of Allergy Evaluation at the End of Study 18 months Provider assessment of feasibility of providing PCN testing in the STD clinic setting. This was based on a team-developed questionnaire using Likert scale questions that asked about feasibility and self-efficacy in performing the assessments. Feasibility defined by 1-5 scale, with 1= highly feasible and 5=not feasible. Reported as number of providers who found PCN testing feasible.
Patient Acceptability of PCN Testing/Oral Challenge Assessed by a Study Team Developed Questionnaire Immediately after intervention Brief Acceptabilty Questionnaire to subjects on acceptability of PCN allergy testing in the STD clinic setting. Reported as number of participants who found testing acceptable. Questionnaire asked subjects whether they found the process helpful and whether they would return for this type of testing. Using a 1-5 scale, with 1 defined as extremely helpful and 5 defined as not helpful.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
University of Washington-Harborview Medical Center
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States
Louisiana State University
🇺🇸New Orleans, Louisiana, United States