MedPath

Penicillin Allergy Testing in STD Clinics

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Penicillin Allergy
Interventions
Drug: Direct Oral challenge
Drug: Penicillin Major Determinant (PrePen) Skin Testing
Registration Number
NCT04620746
Lead Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Brief Summary

Demonstration project to implement penicillin allergy testing in STD outpatients using a questionnaire and pen allergy testing

Detailed Description

all subjects receive risk questionnaire For subjects without high risk responses, randomized to direct oral challenge or PCN skin testing followed by oral challenge

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
284
Inclusion Criteria
  • Prior history of PCN allergy
Exclusion Criteria
  • No immunodeficiency or contraindication to skin testing

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Direct Oral ChallengeDirect Oral challengeThese subjects with reported PCN allergy and low risk responses will bypass skin testing and have direct oral challenge with amoxicillin
Skin Testing ArmPenicillin Major Determinant (PrePen) Skin TestingThese subjects with reported PCN allergy and reported low risk responses will receive skin testing followed by oral challenge
Skin Testing ArmDirect Oral challengeThese subjects with reported PCN allergy and reported low risk responses will receive skin testing followed by oral challenge
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Respondents Who Responded YES to Any Question Defining High Risk Penicillin Allergy Using Questionnaire Developed by the StudyBaseline

Used yes/no questionnaire designed by study team. Any positive response on the high-risk history was grounds for exclusion from randomization to allergy testing arm

Safety of Direct Oral Challenge Defined by Number of Subjects Who Did Not Have Pre-defined Changes in Vital Signs or Pre-defined Emergence of New Respiratory or Skin Symptoms After Oral Challenge30 minutes after intervention

Safety was determined by the presence or absence of adverse reactions. Symptoms assessed included pruritis, flushing, shortness of breath. Physical examination included vital signs, blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate and peak expiratory flow

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Provider Assessment of Feasibility of Allergy Evaluation at the End of Study18 months

Provider assessment of feasibility of providing PCN testing in the STD clinic setting. This was based on a team-developed questionnaire using Likert scale questions that asked about feasibility and self-efficacy in performing the assessments. Feasibility defined by 1-5 scale, with 1= highly feasible and 5=not feasible. Reported as number of providers who found PCN testing feasible.

Patient Acceptability of PCN Testing/Oral Challenge Assessed by a Study Team Developed QuestionnaireImmediately after intervention

Brief Acceptabilty Questionnaire to subjects on acceptability of PCN allergy testing in the STD clinic setting. Reported as number of participants who found testing acceptable. Questionnaire asked subjects whether they found the process helpful and whether they would return for this type of testing. Using a 1-5 scale, with 1 defined as extremely helpful and 5 defined as not helpful.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

University of Washington-Harborview Medical Center

🇺🇸

Seattle, Washington, United States

Louisiana State University

🇺🇸

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath