NL-OMON39662CompletedNot Applicable
In Vivo Comparison of Air Charged Catheters with Water Filled Catheters for Intravesical and Intrarectal Pressures Recording during Urodynamic Testing. - Comparison AC-WFpressures
T-doc-LLC0 sites36 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 36
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 to 99 (—)
Inclusion Criteria
- •2 sets of criteria follow: for 'all female' and for all persons with neurogenid dysfunction.;Female >18 years
- •Scheduled for urodynamic investigation on the basis of contemporary standards and guidelines, because of signs and symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction.
- •*May perform (not excluded) intermittent (self) catheterisation.
- •No signs of voiding dysfunction (routine outpatient max flow >20mL/s without significant (>100mL)postvoid residual)
- •No signs of bladder /pelvic pain syndrome;OR:
- •Male or female >18years
- •Complete spinal cord injury, level above T12, or meningomyelocele unable to void and significantly reduced or no pelvic floor, urethral and or bladder sensation.
- •* May have (not excluded) *sacral sparing*; some residual anal sensation
- •Scheduled for urodynamic investigation on the basis of contemporary standards and guidelines, because of signs and symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction or because of routine (protocol, guidelines) follow -up.
- •* (Usually: performing intermittent (self) catheterisation); not excluded.
- •* May have (not excluded) chronic indwelling catheter.
Exclusion Criteria
- •One (or more) of the following necessitates exclusion of the patient:;Male with normal lower urinary tract sensation.;Unwilling or unfit to sign informed consent.
- •ASA >2; Karnovski <80%.;Women with voiding dysfunction
- •Patients included in other scientific studies (for other reasons).
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 4
Comparative study of the conventional catheter and the new device for cannulation in difficult ERCP case: a multicentre, crossover, randomised controlled trial.pancreatobliary diseaseJPRN-UMIN000026232Department of Gastroenterology. Fukushima Medical University Aizu Medical center.64
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparison of Air Charged Catheters With Water Filled Catheters for Urodynamic StudyIncontinenceNCT02030340UMC Utrecht36
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of uncoated central venous catheters with and without transient coating as product protection with regard to biofilm formatioPrevention of cathetersepsisDRKS00024211Solvamed GmbH852
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of tracheal tubes for tracheal intubation in children undergoing surgery for tonsils removalAdenoids, chronic diseases of tonsils and adenoidsA04.623.557.500J35.8RBR-9x4s6yFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP
Completed
Not Applicable
Air-charged vs Water-filled Catheters (Bonn)UrodynamicsNCT02756182Laborie Medical Technologies Inc.25