Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01174472
NCT01174472CompletedPhase 2

Drug Eluting Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Failing Dialysis Access. A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Trial.

University of Patras1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2010Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Completed
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Technical success

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the feasibility and the effectiveness, by means of immediate and long-term results, of drug eluting balloon (DEB) versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of failing dialysis access.

Detailed Description

In total 40 patients already diagnosed with hemodynamically significant stenosis of the dialysis AVF or AVG (including venous outflow lesions), programmed to undergo percutaneous transluminal angioplasty by our department, will sign informed consent and will be randomized to either receive DEB (Paclitaxel eluting balloon), or conventional balloon therapy. The protocol includes the description of patient's demographics (age, gender,dialysis access details, risk factors) and procedural details, as well as immediate results and long-term follow up.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Angiographic and clinical diagnosis of dysfunctional dialysis access due to one or more stenotic lesions.
  • •Patients with AVF or AVG
  • •Fistula or graft or vessel diameter ranging from 3 mm up to 12 mm

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Fistula or graft or vessel diameter < 3 mm and > 12 mm
  • •History of severe allergic reaction to contrast media
  • •Intolerance to aspirin and/or clopidogrel
  • •Systemic coagulopathy or hypercoagulation disorders

Arms & Interventions

Conventional Balloon Angioplasty (COBA)

Active Comparator

Patients with lesions treated with conventional balloon angioplasty

Intervention: Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) (Device)

Drug Eluting Balloon Angioplasty (DEB)

Experimental

Patients with lesions treated with Drug Balloon Angioplasty

Intervention: Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Technical success

Time Frame: 1 minute after the final balloon angioplasty

Residual stenosis of the treated lesion less than 30%, without any hemodynamicaly significant dissection (Type C)after the final angiography

Primary patency

Time Frame: 1 year

Angiographic visualization of a lesion with \<50% restenosis and no need for any additional repeat interventional procedure within the previously treated lesion, due to failing access.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Secondary patency(1 year)
  • Target lesion re-intervention (TLR)-free interval(1 year)
  • Major complications rates(Periprocedural and up to 1 year)
  • Minor complications rates(Periprocedural and up to 1 year follow-up)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

SIABLIS DIMITRIOS

Professor of Radiology

University of Patras

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials