Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03774251
NCT03774251WithdrawnEarly Phase 1

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-guided Platelet-Rich-Plasma (PRP) Injection Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) for Great Trochanter Pain Syndrome (GTPS) With Gluteus Medius or Minimus Tendinopathy

Stanford University2 sites in 1 countryStarted: October 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Early Phase 1
Status
Withdrawn
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Improvement in Function as measured by the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHot)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy for management of refractory Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS).

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy for management of refractory Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS).

GTPS is a common cause of extra-articular lateral hip pain which occurs in up to 10- 25% of the population, and is a common presenting complaint to primary care and Sports Medicine clinics. Previously, most cases of GTPS were diagnosed as trochanteric bursitis, for which the standard treatment focused on relieving inflammation with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications and corticosteroid injections. However, corticosteroid injections typically only provide short term pain relief, likely secondary to the fact that the underlying pathology is likely not from an isolated bursal inflammation. Recent studies suggest that in fact the most common cause of GTPS is gluteus medius or minimus tendinopathy or tear. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) has been used in treating tendinopathies and tendon tears throughout the body to promote healing through the concentrated growth factors released from platelets. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is another treatment which has been used increasingly in the treatment of tendinopathies. The purpose of this randomized prospective study is to compare the efficacy of PRP injection to ESWT in treating patients with a clinical diagnosis of GTPS.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Individuals with documented diagnosis of greater trochanter pain syndrome, with MRI evidence of gluteus minimus or medius tendinopathy, whose lateral hip pain has been refractory to conservative management with non-steroid anti-inflammatory medications and at least 6 weeks of Physical Therapy.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age < 18 or > 65 years
  • Full-thickness tear of the involved gluteal tendons, bursa, and intra-articular structures.
  • Evidence of concomitant injury to the involved lower extremity, including radiculopathy or radiculitis, piriformis syndrome, ischial tuberosity avulsion
  • History of prior steroid injection and Orthobiologic injection or surgery to the involved lower extremity f. Any inflammatory or neoplastic disorder
  • g. Blood coagulation disorders or use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs h. Severe knee or hip osteoarthritis i. Patients with symptoms of more than 6 months' duration were not considered as patients in the chronic stages of this condition and may require a different therapeutic approach including surgical treatment.
  • j. Severe Diabetes Mellitus who need insulin injection k. Severe active lumbar radiculopathy with pain, numbness, or weakness in a dermatomal distribution l. Implanted pacemaker

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Improvement in Function as measured by the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHot)

Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Improvement in Function as measured by the Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS)

Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Improvement in Pain: VAS

Time Frame: 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Michael Fredericson, MD

Professor

Stanford University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

A Randomized Controlled Trial of... | Clinical Trial