Improving Information Sharing Between Family Caregivers and Home Care Aides Caring for Persons Living With ADRD

Direct Care Worker Job Satisfaction assessed by survey question

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Job satisfaction measures the direct care worker's overall job satisfaction on a scale from 1-4 (1= Very dissatisfied, 2=Dissatisfied, 3=Satisfied, 4=Very Satisfied). Higher score is better.

Number of participants with new Direct Care Worker

Time Frame: 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Direct Care Worker Turnover measure changes in the enrolled direct care worker participant in the study from the time baseline is completed to study endpoint at 4 weeks. Caregivers will be asked if the direct care worker left and at what time point in the study, and if the participant was assigned or hired a new worker. This will be measured using affirmative responses (yes or no).

Acceptability as assessed by survey

Time Frame: 2 week and 4 weeks

Participants will be asked to rate their overall feedback of the role and preference guide. Participants will be asked how often they used the guide since the last study time point using a scale from 1 to 5 (1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Occasionally, 4= Often, 5 Constantly) where higher scores indicate greater frequency of use.

Feasibility as assessed by survey

Time Frame: 2 week and 4 weeks

Participants will be asked about how helpful the guide was using a scale from 1 to 5:1=Not helpful at all, 2=Not too helpful, 3=Somewhat helpful, 4=Pretty helpful, 5=Very helpful, where higher scores indicate more helpful. More affirmative responses indicate better feasibility of the guide.

Low Social Engagement as assessed by survey question

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Low social engagement measures an older adult's ability to participate in social activities of longstanding interest reported by the caregiver. This item is measured on a scale from 0-3 (0=Occurred in the last 3 days, 1=Occurred within the last week, 2=Occurred within the last month, 3=Last occurred more than one month ago) where higher scores mean lesser ability to participate in social activities.

Caregiver is Overwhelmed as assessed by survey question

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Caregivers' feelings of being overwhelmed measures how often a caregiver is overwhelmed by aspects of caregiving responsibilities and older adults' illness. This item is measured using a scale from 1-5 (1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Occasionally, 4=Often, 5= Constantly) where higher scores mean greater feelings of being overwhelmed.

Caregiver Distress assessed by survey question

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Caregivers' feelings of distress measures how often a caregiver is distressed by aspects of caregiving responsibilities and older adults' illness. This item is measured using a scale from 1-5 (1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Occasionally, 4=Often, 5= Constantly) where higher scores mean greater feelings of distress.

Caregiver Continuity assessed by survey item

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Caregivers continuity measures how feelings on inability to continue caregiving. This item is measured using a scale from 1-5 (1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Occasionally, 4=Often, 5= Constantly) where higher scores mean greater feelings of distress.

Caregiver Preparedness assessed by The Caregiving Preparedness Scale (CPS)

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

The Caregiving Preparedness Scale (CPS) is an 8-item uni-dimensional instrument that evaluates the extent to which a caregiver and direct care worker feels prepared to meet the psychological and physical needs of a patient (client). The scale was originally developed for family caregivers and has been used to assess caregiver preparedness in direct care workers in prior work. Responses are categorized with a 5-level likert scale: Not at all prepared; not too prepared; somewhat well prepared; pretty well prepared; very well prepared. The total scale score, which is a mean of all items scores, ranges between 0 and 4 with higher score indicating better preparedness.

Relational Coordination assessed by survey

Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

Relational coordination suggests that effective coordination occurs through frequent, high-quality communication that is supported by relationships of shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect. Its measurement has been applied across several settings, including home care. Family caregivers and direct care workers will rate interactions with each other along three dimensions, with seven questions on a five-point scale related to the components of relational coordination. Four items related to communication include: frequency, timeliness, accuracy, and problem-solving. Three items measured relationships: shared knowledge, goals, and respect for each other. The mean of each of the seven items is calculated for each group (family caregivers and direct care workers). The total score for all items ranges from 7 to 35 where higher scores indicate better coordination and communication among family caregiver and direct care worker.