MedPath

Non Interventional Study (NIS) Regarding the Application of Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray in Patients With Acute Laryngitis and/or Acute Pharyngitis

Completed
Conditions
Acute Laryngitis
Acute Pharyngitis
Registration Number
NCT02160912
Lead Sponsor
Bitop AG
Brief Summary

In this observational study insights regarding the tolerability and influence on the quality of life of the topical treatment Ectoin Mund- and Rachenspray compared to Emser Pastillen in patients with acute Pharyngitis/ Laryngitis under real life conditions shall be gained.

Patients are treated with Ectoin Mund- \& Rachenspray 1% or Emser Pastillen according to the demands of the physician and the instructions for use.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
95
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with acute Laryngitis and/or Pharyngitis which are already treated with Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray 1% or Emser Pastillen
Exclusion Criteria
  • contraindications according to instructions for use

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Pharyngitis symptom score evaluated by the physicianVisit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visite 3 (after 7 days)

Assessment of the symptoms of pharyngitis on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate strong):

* swollen palatine tonsils

* swollen lymph nodes in the throat

* fever

* cough

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in patient's general condition evaluated by the physicianVisit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)

Physician's assessment of the general conditions on a 4 point scale (good condition, slightly reduced condition, bad condition, very bad condition)

Change in Evaluation of the hoarsenessVisit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)

physician's assessment of the hoarseness of the patient on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, strong)

Change in DysphagiaVisit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)

physician's assessment of dysphagia of the patient on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, strong)

Change in efficacy evaluation by the physicianVisit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 1 week)

Assessment of the efficacy on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)

Change in efficacy evaluation by the patientVisit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)

Assessment of the efficacy on a 4 point scale (0_bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)

Change in Evaluation of the tolerability by the physicianVisit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days))

Assessment of the tolerability by the physician on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)

Change in Evaluation of the tolerability by the patientVisit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days))

Assessment of the tolerability by the patient on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)

Change in number and type of adverse eventsVisit 2 (after 3 days) Visit 3 (after 7 days)

incidence of adverse events and correlation with the therapy

Trial Locations

Locations (8)

HNO Praxis Aachen Brand

🇩🇪

Aachen, Germany

Bey - Facharzt f. HNO Heilkunde

🇩🇪

Köln, Germany

HNo Praxis Dr. Uta Thieme

🇩🇪

Duisburg, Germany

Wilhelm Schütz -Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde

🇩🇪

Jülich, Germany

Taufik Shahab -Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde

🇩🇪

Köln, Germany

Norbert Pasch-Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde

🇩🇪

Aachen, Germany

Dr. Lenzenhuber-Fachärztin für HNO Heilkunde

🇩🇪

Jülich, Germany

HNO-Praxis Peter Hinterkausen & Dr. med. Eva Bottler-Neufert

🇩🇪

Köln, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath