Non Interventional Study (NIS) Regarding the Application of Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray in Patients With Acute Laryngitis and/or Acute Pharyngitis
- Conditions
- Acute LaryngitisAcute Pharyngitis
- Registration Number
- NCT02160912
- Lead Sponsor
- Bitop AG
- Brief Summary
In this observational study insights regarding the tolerability and influence on the quality of life of the topical treatment Ectoin Mund- and Rachenspray compared to Emser Pastillen in patients with acute Pharyngitis/ Laryngitis under real life conditions shall be gained.
Patients are treated with Ectoin Mund- \& Rachenspray 1% or Emser Pastillen according to the demands of the physician and the instructions for use.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 95
- Patients with acute Laryngitis and/or Pharyngitis which are already treated with Ectoin Mund- & Rachenspray 1% or Emser Pastillen
- contraindications according to instructions for use
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Pharyngitis symptom score evaluated by the physician Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visite 3 (after 7 days) Assessment of the symptoms of pharyngitis on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate strong):
* swollen palatine tonsils
* swollen lymph nodes in the throat
* fever
* cough
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in patient's general condition evaluated by the physician Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days) Physician's assessment of the general conditions on a 4 point scale (good condition, slightly reduced condition, bad condition, very bad condition)
Change in Evaluation of the hoarseness Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days) physician's assessment of the hoarseness of the patient on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, strong)
Change in Dysphagia Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days) physician's assessment of dysphagia of the patient on a 4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, strong)
Change in efficacy evaluation by the physician Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 1 week) Assessment of the efficacy on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)
Change in efficacy evaluation by the patient Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days) Assessment of the efficacy on a 4 point scale (0_bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)
Change in Evaluation of the tolerability by the physician Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)) Assessment of the tolerability by the physician on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)
Change in Evaluation of the tolerability by the patient Visit 1, Visit 2 (after 3 days), Visit 3 (after 7 days)) Assessment of the tolerability by the patient on a 4 point scale (0= bad, 1=sufficient, 2=good, 3=very good)
Change in number and type of adverse events Visit 2 (after 3 days) Visit 3 (after 7 days) incidence of adverse events and correlation with the therapy
Trial Locations
- Locations (8)
HNO Praxis Aachen Brand
🇩🇪Aachen, Germany
Bey - Facharzt f. HNO Heilkunde
🇩🇪Köln, Germany
HNo Praxis Dr. Uta Thieme
🇩🇪Duisburg, Germany
Wilhelm Schütz -Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde
🇩🇪Jülich, Germany
Taufik Shahab -Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde
🇩🇪Köln, Germany
Norbert Pasch-Facharzt für HNO Heilkunde
🇩🇪Aachen, Germany
Dr. Lenzenhuber-Fachärztin für HNO Heilkunde
🇩🇪Jülich, Germany
HNO-Praxis Peter Hinterkausen & Dr. med. Eva Bottler-Neufert
🇩🇪Köln, Germany