MedPath

Dexamethasone Vs. Dexmedetomidine for ESPB in Pain Management After Knee Arthroplasty

Phase 4
Recruiting
Conditions
Knee Arthritis
Knee Disease
Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Pain Chronic
Interventions
Drug: 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection
Registration Number
NCT06470100
Lead Sponsor
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Brief Summary

Effect of perineurial dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on erector spinal plane block duration for knee arthroplasty

Detailed Description

This study is proposed to explore the effect of perineurial Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine on erector spinal plane block duration for spine surgery.

After spine surgery, patients need good analgesia. Peripheral nerve blocks have provided a safe, effective method to control early postoperative pain when symptoms are most severe.

Local anaesthesia's much lower toxicity threshold makes it essential for its safety. An effective adjuvant, such as Dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine, could allow for a higher dilution of local anaesthetics while maintaining and enhancing their analgesic effect.

There is considerable research comparing intravenous and perineural dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine use in orthopaedic surgeries. However, there is a massive lack of research regarding knee surgery and the Erector Spine Plane Block.

In this study, investigators compare perineural Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine.

The investigator aims to find a dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine that covers the need for good pain relief and fast recovery postoperatively.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty
  • aged >18 years and <100 years
  • ASA physical status 1, 2 or 3.
Exclusion Criteria
  • if they refused to participate,
  • had a history of opioid abuse,
  • had an infection of the site of needle puncture,
  • were less than 18 years of age,
  • were postponed as having ASA 4 or 5,
  • had an allergy to any of the drugs used in the study,
  • renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate <15ml/min/1.73m2),
  • liver failure,
  • known or suspected coagulopathy,
  • pre-existing anatomical or neurological disorders in the lower extremities,
  • intellectual disability with problems in pain evaluation,
  • severe psychiatric illness.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
DexamethasoneDexamethasone0.2% ropivacaine + 4mg Dexamethasone for erector spinae plane block
DexmedetomidineDexmedetomidine0.2% ropivacaine + 50ug Dexmedetomidine for erector spinae plane block
Control group0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection0.2% ropivacaine for erector spinae plane block
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
first need of opiate48 hours after surgery

Time after surgery when the patient needs opiate for the first time

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Opioid consumption48 hours after surgery

Total opioid consumption after surgery

Numerical Rating Scale [range 0:10]48 hours after surgery

NRS (Numerical Rating Scale; 0 - no pain; 10 - the worst pain ever)

Nerve damage [range 0-4]48 hours after surgery

Nerve damage assesment will be performed using the nerve damage score (N0- no nerve damage; N1- minor - sensory paresthesia; N2- major -complete sensory anesthesia; N3- Complete- complete motor defect with or without paraesthesia; N4-CRPS- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

🇵🇱

Poznan, Poznań, Poland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath