A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mental Health Peer-Led Education

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Mental Disorders

Interventions: Behavioral: BRIDGES Peer-Led Education

Registration Number: NCT01297985

Lead Sponsor: University of Illinois at Chicago

Brief Summary: This randomized controlled trial tests the efficacy of a mental health peer-led educational intervention called BRIDGES (Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals through Education and Support). The BRIDGES program is a 10-week, manualized education course designed to provide basic information about the etiology and treatment of mental illness, self-help skills, and recovery principles in order to empower participants to return to valued social roles within their communities. BRIDGES is a peer-led program and all instructors are adults with mental illnesses. For study purposes, the 10-week course was modified to 8-weeks, meeting 2 1/2 hours once a week.

Hypothesis #1: Compared to wait-list controls, intervention participants will report increased feelings of psychological empowerment.

Hypothesis #2: Compared to wait-list controls, intervention participants will report increased feelings of hopefulness.

Hypothesis #3: Compared to wait-list controls, intervention participants will report enhanced coping ability.

Hypothesis #4: Compared to wait-list controls, intervention participants will report enhanced recovery.

Hypothesis #5: Compared to wait-list controls, intervention participants will report greater ability to advocate for themselves with health care providers.

Hypothesis #6: Compared to wait-list controls, those in the BRIDGES education course will report increased knowledge of the causes and treatment of mental illness and recovery principles.

Detailed Description: Eligibility criteria included having a diagnosis of serious mental illness and experiencing severe functional impairment in one or more life roles. All study participants completed telephone interviews at three points in time: study entry (pre-intervention); 8-weeks later (immediate post-intervention); and 6-months after intervention (approximately 8 months after study entry). Blinded interviewers administered valid and reliable outcome assessments that measured changes in subjects' knowledge about mental illness; emotional well-being; empowerment; hopefulness; self-advocacy; and recovery. All study participants were compensated for their time at each interview. All BRIDGES instructors were people in recovery from serious mental illnesses who were certified and experienced BRIDGES teachers. Fidelity to the BRIDGES curriculum was assessed on an ongoing basis throughout the study.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 428

Inclusion Criteria

Clinical diagnosis of mental illness
Disability due to mental illness
Age 18 years or older
Willingness to receive the intervention

Exclusion Criteria

Inability to understand spoken English

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
BRIDGES Intervention	BRIDGES Peer-Led Education	The BRIDGES program is a 10-week, manualized education course designed to provide basic education about the etiology and treatment of mental illness, self-help skills, and recovery principles in order to empower participants to return to valued social roles within their communities. BRIDGES is a peer-led program and all instructors are adults with mental illnesses. For this intervention study, the BRIDGES curriculum was modified from a 10-week course to an 8-week course, meeting for 2 1/2 hours once a week.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Recovery From Mental Illness	Study entry (Pre-intervention/T1), 8-weeks later (Post-Intervention 1/T2), & 6-months after T2 (Post-Intervention 2/T3)	Recovery from mental illness is measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) (Giffort et al., 1995). Recovery is a psychosocial outcome assessed via patient self-ratings on a 41-item scale using a 5-point Likert-response format ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." The minimum value for the RAS is 41 and the maximum is 205, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Dimensions of recovery include personal confidence and hope, willingness to ask for help, goal and success orientation, reliance on others, and no being dominated by one's residual psychiatric symptoms.
Personal Empowerment	Study entry (Pre-intervention/T1), 8-weeks later (Post-Intervention 1/T2), & 6-months after T2 (Post-Intervention 2/T3)	Personal psychological empowerment is measured via the Boston University Empowerment Scale (Rogers et al.,1997). This 28-item instrument designed to measure subjective feelings of empowerment via self-report in which respondents answer questions on a four-point scale ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. The minimum score is 28 and the maximum is 112, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Hopefulness	Study entry (Pre-intervention/T1), 8-weeks later (Post-Intervention 1/T2), & 6-months after T2 (Post-Intervention 2/T3)	Hopefulness is measured by the State Hope Scale (Snyder et al., 1991). Hopefulness as a cross-situational long-term trait is assessed via patient self-report using a 12-item scale assessed on a 4-point Likert response scale with options ranging from "definitely false" to "definitely true" and summed to produce a total score and sub-scale scores. The minimum value for this scale is 12 and the maximum value is 48. Higher scores indicate a better income.
Coping Style	Study entry (Pre-intervention/T1), 8-weeks later (Post-Intervention 1/T2), & 6-months after T2 (Post-Intervention 2/T3)	Coping is measured via patient self-report using The Brief COPE Inventory (Carver, 1997), a 28-item instrument with 4-point Likert responses ranging from 1-"I haven't been doing this at all" to 4-"I have been doing this a lot." This measure includes two subscales that assess participants' adaptive coping skills (e.g., planning and using emotional support to deal with problems) and maladaptive coping skills (e.g., self-blame and denial). Scoring involves computing the means for each subscale, with a minimum value of 1 and a maximum value of 4. Higher adaptive coping scores indicate a greater use of positive coping styles; higher maladaptive coping scores indicate a greater use of negative coping styles (in other words, lower maladative coping scores indicate a better outcome).
Patient Self-advocacy	Study entry (Pre-intervention/T1), 8-weeks later (Post-Intervention 1/T2), & 6-months after T2 (Post-Intervention 2/T3)	The ability to advocate for oneself with medical care providers is assessed via self-report using The Patient Self-Advocacy Scale (Brashers et al., 1999), an 18-item scale with a 5-point Likert response set ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." Dimensions include in patient knowledge, assertiveness, and potential for mindful non-adherence to treatment. Scoring involves computing the mean scale score, so therefore values range from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 5, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Reported below are findings for the assertiveness sub-scale.