RMN Versus Manual Epicardial Retrospective PMCF
- Conditions
- Ventricular TachycardiaPremature Ventricular Contraction
- Interventions
- Device: Epicardial mapping and/or ablation
- Registration Number
- NCT04171479
- Lead Sponsor
- Stereotaxis
- Brief Summary
Retrospective registry will compare subjects who've undergone a mapping and/or ablation procedure for either ischemic ventricular tachycardia or premature ventricular contraction using an epicardial approach with either manual or remote magnetic navigation. Subjects will be compared with regards to safety, efficacy and mortality.
- Detailed Description
Up to 10 centers in the European Union will be selected to conduct the trial. Once a site is a selected, receives local Ethics Committee approval, and receives Sponsor approval to enroll, the site will begin enrollment. All subjects must meet eligibility criteria and follow protocol and ethics committee requirements regarding informed consent prior to enrollment. Once a subject is enrolled, the site may begin reviewing the subject's medical records and entering data into the electronic data capture system. Once enrollment and retrospective data entry is complete at a site, a monitoring visit will occur where source data verification will occur.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- 18 years of age or older
- Have undergone an epicardial RF mapping and/or ablation for a ventricular tachycardia (VT) as standard of care treatment using either the Niobe MNS or a manual approach
- Index procedure was conducted between July 1, 2013-present date.
- NA, all subjects who meet inclusion criteria may be enrolled.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Remote Magnetic Navigation Epicardial mapping and/or ablation Subjects who underwent epicardial mapping and/or ablation using a remote magnetic technique (using Stereotaxis Niobe system) will comprise this group. Manual Epicardial mapping and/or ablation Subjects who underwent epicardial mapping and/or ablation using a manual technique will comprise this group.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Procedural Safety: rates of device-and procedure-related serious adverse events 48 hours post index procedure Assess rates of device-and procedure-related serious adverse events in both groups.
Acute Success intra-operative Characterize acute success rates for both groups. Acute success for VT procedures is defined as non-inducibility of clinical VT and/or other monomorphic VT at the end of the index-procedure. Acute success for PVC procedures is defined as no recurrence and non-inducibility of culprit PVC at the end of the index-procedure.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mortality 1 year post index procedure Assess mortality rate for both groups
Chronic Safety: rates of device-or procedure-related serious adverse events At last follow up visit, estimated up to 6 years post-procedure for some patients Characterize rates of device-or procedure-related serious adverse events for both groups at last follow up.
Chronic Success At last follow up visit, estimated up to 6 years post-procedure for some patients Characterize recurrence rates for both groups at last follow up.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
OLVG Hospital
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Netherlands
Na Homolce Hospital
🇨🇿Prague, Czechia
Erasmus Medical Center
🇳🇱Rotterdam, Netherlands