Models of Care in the Transition From the Secondary to the Primary Sector Among the Frailest Elderly
- Conditions
- Frail Elderly SyndromeFrailtyReadmissionTransitional CareAgingElderly
- Interventions
- Other: Early follow-up visit after dischargeOther: Possible follow-up visit from GPOther: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)Other: Continued geriatric care
- Registration Number
- NCT03796923
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Brief Summary
In most Western countries the elderly population increases rapidly. In Denmark, the population of elderly aged 75 years or older may amount to nearly 15 % of the entire population in 2050 compared to 9 % today (2017). A large part of the elderly population is at high risk of hospitalization including more admissions and increased morbidity and mortality. The number of hospital beds is declining persistently, calling for shorter lengths of stay (LOS). Increasingly complex treatments now take place outside hospital. Presently, many Danish regional hospitals establish geriatric wards and other geriatric in-hospital and outpatient services to overcome these challenges. The aim of the present PhD-study is to investigate the effects of different models of transitional care among the frailest elderly patients.
- Detailed Description
Design Population: The frailest acutely admitted geriatric patients aged +75. Intervention: Early follow-up visits after discharge. Comparison: Usual care follow-up. Outcomes: The primary outcome is readmission within 30 days after discharge. Secondary outcomes are: mortality 30 days after discharge and 90 days after admission, length of stay (LOS), direct discharge from the Emergency Department, time at home before readmission, duration of readmission and physical functional status 30 days after discharge.
Methods The first study is conducted as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) using two different degrees of intervention. The second study is a cohort study of an unexposed control group. The third study is sub-group analyses of the RCT data according to frailty status and type of dwelling.
A focus group comprised of included patients and relatives will be set to identify additional patient related outcome measures (PROMs) and to participate in an advisory group throughout the remaining project.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 3340
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intervention I Early follow-up visit after discharge Intervention (I): early follow-up visit from the community nurse within 24 hours after discharge Intervention I Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) Intervention (I): early follow-up visit from the community nurse within 24 hours after discharge Intervention II Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) Intervention (II): early follow-up by the geriatric team within 24 hours after discharge Intervention II Continued geriatric care Intervention (II): early follow-up by the geriatric team within 24 hours after discharge Control Possible follow-up visit from GP Usual care: individualized follow-up performed by the GP and municipality services Intervention II Early follow-up visit after discharge Intervention (II): early follow-up by the geriatric team within 24 hours after discharge
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Readmission 30 days Readmission within 30 days after discharge
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Length of stay (LOS) 30 days after primary discharge Length of stay during primary admission and total length of stay including following readmissions
Mortality 90 days after admission and 30 days after primary discharge Mortality within 90 days after admission and 30 days after discharge
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Aarhus University
🇩🇰Aarhus, Denmark