A comparative evaluation between linscope videolaryngoscope and king vision videolaryngoscope in patients undergoing tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia - a randomized control study.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 1 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 70
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Intubation time
研究概览
简要总结
A comparative evaluation between linscope videolaryngoscope and kingsvision videolaryngoscope inpatients undergoing tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia a randomized control study.
Mohd Luqman***, Syed Moied Ahmed**
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care
JNMCH AMU Aligarh
***Presenting Author,**Professor,*
INTRODUCTION
Airway management is of supreme importance in any clinical situation including cardiopulmonary
resuscitation, anesthesia ,emergency medicine,intensive care and first aid as it is one of the life
saving measures described under the acronym ABCD.Managing a difficult airway has always been
a challenging task for an Anesthesiologist,as at times it is life threatening.
The curved laryngoscopic blade described by Macintosh in 1943 is the most popular device for
tracheal intubation till date but its use is a difficult skill to acquire and even the most experienced
Anesthesiologist may encounter difficulties in its use.So alternative techniques have been
developed to assist intubation in such cases of difficult direct laryngoscopy.Video laryngoscopy is
relatively recent development that improves the success of tracheal intubation.
The purpose of the study is to compare the ease of intubation using Video laryngoscope(Linscope
Video laryngoscope) and kingsvision in elective adult
surgical patients.
Materials and Methods
Elective endotracheal intubation will be carried out by using linscope video laryngoscope, and
kingsvision video laryngoscope in 30 patients in each group.
Intubation time, ease of intubation.,number of adjustment maneuvers,glottic
view using Cormack Lehane Grading,changes in heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure during
laryngoscopy and intubation ,any trauma during the same will be compared in 2 groups.
RESULT
Study will be started after a few weeks.Above quoted parameters will be recorded and compared
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •ASA Grade I and II patients Age between 20-65 years Weight between 40-75kg Patients of both sexes Patients planned for elective surgery All classes of MP grades.
排除标准
- •Previous history of multiple /failed intubation Predicted difficult laryngoscopy Any pathology of the oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device Mouth opening less than 2.5cm Potentially full stomach patients (trauma,morbid obesity,pregnancy,history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn)and at risk of oesophageal reflux (hiatus hernia.
结局指标
主要结局
Intubation time
时间窗: 1 year
次要结局
- Ease of tracheal intubation Glottic view using(Cormack and Lehane Grading)