跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05722197
NCT05722197招募中不适用

Real-Time Assessment of Emotion Regulation Strategies Used by Suicidal Military Personnel

Ohio State University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 334 人开始时间: 2022年1月23日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
334
试验地点
1
主要终点
Suicidal Ideation - Ecological Momentary Assessment

研究概览

简要总结

Crisis Response Planning is an efficacious, one-session intervention that increases positive affect, decreases negative affect and psychiatric hospitalizations, and reduces suicide attempts by 76% among Servicemembers. Crisis Response Planning is hypothesized to reduce suicidality by identifying a variety of personalized strategies that are designed to strengthen and/or promote emotion regulation processes.Research in nonmilitary samples suggests the effectiveness of emotion regulation strategies varies across situations. The applicability of these findings to suicidality among Servicemembers is unknown. Improved understanding of what strategies work under which circumstances and for whom will significantly advance our ability to prevent suicide among Servicemembers. Hypotheses include:

  1. Use of self-management strategies, thinking about reasons for living, and seeking social support at time t will be associated with significant reductions in suicidal ideation at time t+1.
  2. Use of distraction, reappraisal, and interpersonal emotion regulation strategies at time t will be associated with significant reductions in suicidal ideation at time t+1.
  3. Affect intensity and social context will significantly moderate the time-lagged effects of Crisis Response Planning and emotion regulation strategy use on suicidal ideation.
  4. Distinct profiles of demographic (e.g., gender, age), historical (e.g., prior suicide attempts), and psychological characteristics (e.g., emotion dysregulation, symptom severity) will predict who experiences a decrease in suicidal ideation following the use of Crisis Response Planning and emotion regulation strategies.
  5. (Exploratory): Individuals who utilize their Crisis Response Planning more frequently and perceive Crisis Response Planning as more effective will be more likely to engage in mental health treatment at follow-up.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Currently serving in any Branch or Component of the U.S. military
  • >18 years old;
  • Score ≥ 5 on the Scale for Suicidal Ideation and/or endorse a suicide attempt, aborted attempt, or interrupted attempt within the past month on the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised (SITBI-R)
  • Ability and willingness to complete research-related activities remotely
  • Regular access to an Android or Apple smartphone that is compatible with the ecological momentary assessment application

排除标准

  • Engagement in mental health treatment within the past year (including taking psychotropic medications)
  • A psychiatric or medical condition that preventing providing informed consent or from participating in the treatments (e.g., psychosis, mania, acute intoxication); or - Expecting to separate from the military within 90 days

研究组 & 干预措施

Crisis Response Plan and Lethal Means Counseling

Experimental

All participants will complete a narrative suicide risk assessment, collaboratively develop a Crisis Response Plan, and receive lethal means counseling. The Crisis Response Plan will include the following sections: (1) identifying personal warning signs for suicide; (2) identifying self-regulation strategies for reducing emotional distress; (3) identifying reasons for living; (4) identifying sources of social support; and (5) accessing professional crisis services. Participants will handwrite the plan on an index card, sheet of paper, or another similar medium. After completing the Crisis Response Planning, researchers will conduct lethal means counseling to develop a plan for restricting or limiting access to potentially lethal methods of suicide.

干预措施: Crisis Response Planning and Lethal Means Safety Counseling (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Suicidal Ideation - Ecological Momentary Assessment

时间窗: Change over 28 consecutive days

Participants are asked a series of six questions assessing current suicidal ideation. Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicative of more severe suicidal ideation.

次要结局

  • Scale for Suicide Ideation(baseline, 1,2,3,6,9, and 12 months after baseline)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Lauren Khazem

Research Assistant Professor

Ohio State University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验