Comparison between stented, stentless and transcatheter aortic valve bioprostheses using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging

Completed

• Conditions: aortic valve bioprostheses; prosthetic heart valve; 10046973

• Registration Number: NL-OMON44677
• Lead Sponsor: Academisch Medisch Centrum

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Last Update Posted: 23 April 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

Adult patients who had an aortic valve replacement with a Mitroflow or SOLO bioprotheses, or a transcatheter aortic valve implantation with an Edwards Sapien.

Exclusion Criteria

Multiple valve replacements
Contraindication for MRI (see protocol for specification)

Study & Design

• Study Type: Observational non invasive
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
<p>maximum and average flow velocity, flow pattern and wall shear stress and<br /><br>kinetic energy loss over the aortic valve</p><br>

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
<p>nvt</p><br>