Comparative Effects of Box and Rhythmic Breathing Techniques on Dyspnea, Pulmonary Functions, and Quality of Sleep Among Asthmatic Patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 36
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Dyspnea Severity
研究概览
简要总结
Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease that can cause breathing difficulties, reduced lung function, and poor sleep quality. Breathing exercises are increasingly used as non-pharmacological interventions to improve respiratory symptoms and overall well-being in individuals with asthma.
This study aims to compare the effects of two breathing techniques, Box Breathing and Rhythmic Breathing, on dyspnea (breathlessness), pulmonary function, and quality of sleep in patients with asthma. Participants with asthma will be randomly assigned to receive either Box Breathing or Rhythmic Breathing exercises in addition to standard care. Both interventions will be performed three times per week for eight weeks.
The primary outcomes of this study include changes in dyspnea severity, pulmonary function measured by spirometry, and sleep quality assessed using validated questionnaires. The findings of this study may help determine which breathing technique is more effective and provide evidence for incorporating structured breathing exercises into asthma management programs.
详细描述
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease characterized by recurrent episodes of dyspnea, airflow limitation, and impaired quality of life. In addition to respiratory symptoms, many individuals with asthma experience sleep disturbances and reduced functional capacity. Breathing exercises have emerged as important non-pharmacological interventions that may improve respiratory control, autonomic regulation, and symptom perception.
Box Breathing and Rhythmic Breathing are structured breathing techniques that have shown potential benefits in respiratory rehabilitation. Box Breathing involves a controlled breathing pattern consisting of equal durations of inhalation, breath holding, exhalation, and breath holding. Rhythmic Breathing involves continuous and controlled breathing with a prolonged expiratory phase to promote respiratory efficiency and relaxation. However, limited evidence exists regarding the comparative effectiveness of these techniques in individuals with asthma.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of Box Breathing and Rhythmic Breathing on dyspnea, pulmonary function, and sleep quality among patients with asthma. Participants will receive standardized baseline respiratory care followed by either Box Breathing or Rhythmic Breathing interventions for eight weeks. The interventions are designed to improve breathing patterns, reduce breathlessness, enhance pulmonary function, and improve sleep quality.
This study aims to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of structured breathing techniques as adjunctive interventions in asthma management. The findings may contribute to the development of evidence-based respiratory rehabilitation protocols and support the integration of breathing exercises into comprehensive asthma care programs.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 40 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Male and female patients diagnosed with asthma.
- •Age between 18 and 40 years.
- •Patients with mild to moderate asthma who are clinically stable.
- •Patients able to understand and follow breathing exercise instructions.
- •Patients willing to provide informed consent and participate in the study.
排除标准
- •Patients with severe or uncontrolled asthma.
- •Patients with acute asthma exacerbation during the study period.
- •Patients with other significant respiratory diseases (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis).
- •Patients with severe cardiovascular, neurological, or musculoskeletal disorders that may interfere with participation.
- •Patients who are pregnant.
- •Patients unable to perform the breathing interventions or complete study assessments.
- •Patients participating in another structured respiratory rehabilitation or breathing exercise program.
结局指标
主要结局
Dyspnea Severity
时间窗: Baseline and 8 weeks (post-intervention)
Dyspnea severity will be assessed using the Modified Borg Scale, a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater perceived breathlessness.
次要结局
- Pulmonary Function (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second [FEV₁])(Baseline and 8 weeks (post-intervention))
- Sleep Quality(Baseline and 8 weeks (post-intervention))