Hemofiltration in Burns: RESCUE (Randomized Controlled Evaluation of Hemofiltration in Adult Burn Patients With Septic Shock and Acute Renal Failure)
- Conditions
- BurnsKidney Failure, AcuteHemofiltrationShock, Septic
- Interventions
- Device: An FDA approved continuous renal replacement deviceOther: Control Group
- Registration Number
- NCT01213914
- Lead Sponsor
- American Burn Association
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is determine if High-Volume Hemofiltration in addition to 'contemporary' care will result in an improvement of select clinical outcomes when compared to 'contemporary' care alone in the treatment of critically ill patients with ARF secondary to septic shock.
- Detailed Description
Acute renal failure (ARF) is a common and devastating complication in critically ill burn patients with mortality reported to be between 80 and 100%.(3-7) Despite recent advances in burn care, the unacceptably high mortality rate in this subgroup has not changed over time. The pathogenesis of ARF in burns, similar to other critically ill populations, is often multi-factorial with one major component being sepsis induced ischemic tubular necrosis. Thus, ARF secondary to septic shock is a common and devastating condition in the burn ICU.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 37
- All adult patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit (ICU) with burns of any size
- Acute renal failure as previously defined by the Veterans Affairs/ National Institutes of Health (VA/NIH) Acute Renal Failure Trial Network study investigators(2)
- Patient is > 48 hours post-burn and in Septic Shock
- Patients 18 or older
- Patient/legally authorized representative willing to provide consent
- Age <18
- Non-thermal injury (exfoliating skin disorders or necrotizing fasciitis)
- Pre-admission diagnosis of end stage renal failure
- Patients already on renal replacement therapy for more than 24 hours
- Patient not expected to survive more than 24 hours after randomization.
- Pregnancy
- Prisoners
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description High-volume hemofiltration at 70ml/kg/hr An FDA approved continuous renal replacement device Paired randomization into four groups via central randomization center. Group 1: age 18-65 and \<40%TBSA Group 2: age 18-65 and \>40%TBSA Group 3: age \>65 and \<40%TBSA Group 4: age \>65 and \>40%TBSA Control group Control Group Contemporary care via consideration of the Burn-Specific Sepsis Bundle adapted form the most recent Surviving Sepsis campaign recommendations and specifically modified to our patient population.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Vasopressor dependency index first 48 hours Vasopressor dependency index = MAP/Inotropic score • This index will correct for the inter-center variability that exists with regards to the point (minimum MAP) at which vasopressors are initiated or weaned off. Thus, this eliminates the need to 'standardize' starting/stopping criteria of vasopressors.
Modified Inotropic index (30) = (dopamine dose X1)+(dobutamine dose X1)+(epi doseX100)+(norepi doseX100)+(phenylephrine doseX100)+(vasopressin doseX100)
• All units recorded at each time point in mcg/kg/min
Mean Arterial Pressure (mmHg)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Vasopressors-free days first 14 days Renal loss (need for long term renal replacement therapy) greater than 28 days PaO2/FiO2 ratio and Oxygenation index first 48 hours Survival 14 days, 28 days, and discharge ICU days Total number of days in ICU from date of Therapy Initiated through discharge Ventilator free days First 28 days after enrollment
Trial Locations
- Locations (9)
Doctors Hospital-Joseph M Still Burn Center
🇺🇸Augusta, Georgia, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center-Burn Center Parkland Health
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
🇺🇸Maywood, Illinois, United States
US Army Institute of Surgical Research
🇺🇸Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States
The Burn Center at Washington Hospital Center
🇺🇸Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Regional Medical Center at Memphis
🇺🇸Memphis, Tennessee, United States
University of Kansas Hospital
🇺🇸Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Tampa General Hospital
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States
Arizona Burn Center
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States