A Randomized Comparison of Transcervical Foley Bulb With Vaginal Misoprostol to Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 200
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- The Time Interval From Induction to Delivery: All Participants
Study Overview
Brief Summary
A randomized, prospective trial will be offered to women admitted to the Roosevelt Hospital labor floor for labor induction. The hypothesis is that the simultaneous use of a foley bulb together with vaginal misoprostol will result in shorter induction to delivery time compared with vaginal misoprostol alone
Detailed Description
- Objectives The hypothesis is that cervical ripening using a foley bulb together with vaginal misoprostol (cytotec) will result in shorter induction to delivery time compared with vaginal misoprostol alone
- Background The rate of induction of labor in the United States is approximately 20% of all births. Induction of labor can result in prolonged labor and increases the rate of cesarean delivery, both of which are associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. Ripening of an unfavorable cervix has become an integral part of the labor induction process. The best method of cervical ripening remains controversial; no one method has proved to be superior. Women requiring labor induction often present with unfavorable cervices which can lead to a prolonged induction. Cervical ripening is often done to increase the likelihood of successful labor induction.
Misoprostol (cytotec) is PGE1 analog and widely used for cervical ripening and is the preferred method of induction of labor based on the safety reported literature. Low-dose (25 mcg) intravaginal misoprostol appears to be safe and effective for cervical ripening in term pregnancy for patients without a history of cesarean section. Compared with other cervical ripening methods, misoprostol has an increased rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours without significant differences in cesarean section rates or fetal outcomes.
The use of the foley catheter for induction of labor was first described by Krause in 1953. In 1967 Embrey and Mollison reported a 94% successful induction rate after using the foley catheter for cervical ripening. Since then, several studies found transcervical foley catheters as effective as prostaglandins preparations for ripening without an increased risk of uterine rupture.
There are many proposed methods for induction of labor including mechanical (transcervical foley bulb) and chemical methods (prostaglandins, oxytocin). A number of randomized trials have compared the use of foley bulb, oxytocin and misoprostol in different combinations for induction of labor and their results are contradictory with regards to induction to delivery time, successful vaginal delivery and labor complications.
There are two studies that evaluated the foley bulb with misoprostol comparing to misoprostol alone. Carbone el al study, found the mean induction to delivery time was 3 hours shorter with the combination of the foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol when compared to vaginal misoprostol alone. In a study by Chung et al, there was no difference in the induction to delivery time.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Supportive Care
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- Female
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Term 37 weeks or more, singleton in cephalic presentation
- •Age 18 years and older
- •Patient admitted for induction of labor
Exclusion Criteria
- •Malpresentation
- •Preterm labor less than 37 weeks of gestation
- •Patients with fetal anomalies
- •Premature rupture of membranes
- •If the cervix is closed and unable to place the foley bulb
- •Multiple gestation
- •Non-reassuring fetal heart tracing
- •Contraindication to misoprostol
- •Contraindication to vaginal delivery (i.e. placenta previa, vasa previa, active vaginal bleeding, marginal previa, macrosomia, etc). History of prior uterine surgery such as cesarean section or myomectomy
Arms & Interventions
misoprostol and foley bulb group
Women in the combination group will receive vaginal misoprostol per standard protocol. In addition, a foley bulb will be inserted digitally or by direct visualization with the use of a sterile speculum. The foley will be inserted through the internal os and filled with 60cc of normal saline. The catheter will be taped to the patient's inner thigh under gentle traction. When the foley bulb has fallen out (spontaneous expulsion), further management of labor depends on the labor team. If this does not occur, the catheter will be deflated and removed after 24 hours. Oxytocin will be initiated in those patients who were not in labor after expulsion or removal of the catheter.
Intervention: Foley bulb (Device)
misoprostol and foley bulb group
Women in the combination group will receive vaginal misoprostol per standard protocol. In addition, a foley bulb will be inserted digitally or by direct visualization with the use of a sterile speculum. The foley will be inserted through the internal os and filled with 60cc of normal saline. The catheter will be taped to the patient's inner thigh under gentle traction. When the foley bulb has fallen out (spontaneous expulsion), further management of labor depends on the labor team. If this does not occur, the catheter will be deflated and removed after 24 hours. Oxytocin will be initiated in those patients who were not in labor after expulsion or removal of the catheter.
Intervention: misoprostol (Device)
misoprostol group
The women in the misoprostol only group will receive 25mcg of misoprostol per vagina every 4hours per the standard hospital protocol. Once the cervix becomes favorable or if the patient is in active labor, or if there is no progress for 24 hours, misoprostol administration will be discontinued. Further management of labor will depend on the labor team. (25mcg tablets are not available commercially; a 100mcg table is cut into fourths by the hospital pharmacist
Intervention: misoprostol (Device)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
The Time Interval From Induction to Delivery: All Participants
Time Frame: Day 1
During labor from the start of the induction to the delivery
Time From Induction to Delivery: VD
Time Frame: Day 1
Time (hours) from induction to delivery: Vaginal Delivery (VD)
Time From Induction to Delivery: CD
Time Frame: Day 1
Time (hours) from induction to delivery: Cesarean Delivery (CD)
Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery: Nulliparous
Time Frame: Day 1
Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery: Multiparous
Time Frame: Day 1
Per Treatment Protocol: Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery
Time Frame: day 1
Secondary Outcomes
- The Time From Active Phase to Delivery(Day 1)
- Estimated Blood Loss(Day 1)
- Incidence of Uterine Tachysystole(Day 1)
- The Time From Induction Until to Active Phase Labor(Day 1)
- Incidence of Chorioamnionitis(Day 1)
- Incidence of Patient Discomfort(Day 1)