跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05632458
NCT05632458招募中不适用

A Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy of Primary Thrombectomy With Double Stent (DS-EVT) Versus Primary Thrombectomy With One Stent (SS-EVT) as an Initial Attempt at Thrombectomy

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 180 人开始时间: 2022年4月21日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
180
试验地点
2
主要终点
Complete recanalization on first pass

研究概览

简要总结

The use of a double stent retriever (Dual-SR) has been proposed as a safe and effective technique. The invesigators hypothesized that the use of Dual-SR primary could lead to higher first-pass effect rates and better outcomes compared to Single-SR primary.

Our goal is to develop a research project to provide additional information on the potential benefits of the simultaneous double stent approach primarily in stroke patients receiving TVS.

A randomized study to compare the efficacy of double primary SR versus single primary SR

详细描述

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open and blinded trial of patients with acute stroke with acute large vessel occlusion (LGO) identified by ASD, in which two strategies will be compared: primary double stent (DS-EVT) versus simple stent (SS-EVT) as an initial attempt at thrombectomy.

Assignment will be stratified according to the initial location of the occlusion: terminal ICA, distal M1, and basilar artery.

The primary objective will be to evaluate the efficacy of the primary strategy DS-EVT defined as first-pass angiographic complete recanalization (TICI 2c-3) compared to SS-EVT.

The primary safety endpoint will assess the safety of the primary DS-EVT strategy compared to SS-EVT, defined as the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), along with any other serious procedure-related adverse events. (excluding those already accounted for in sICH) within 24 hours (-8/+12) after the procedure.

A designated Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will review the primary safety endpoint after every 25 new patients enrolled in the study and determine continuation of the study based on the occurrence of adverse events in each study arm to assess early completion of the study. A first interim efficacy analysis will be performed after enrolling 106 patients and enrollment will be stopped if a significant difference in first-pass recanalization between both groups is demonstrated according to pre-specified stopping rules.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Complete recanalization on first pass

时间窗: 4 months

Comparison of the complete recanalization rate in the first pass in the double stent group compared to the simple stent group, defined as TiCI greater than 2c on the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (eTICI scale)

次要结局

  • Embolization in new territories(4 months)
  • Mortality(4 months)
  • Intracerebral hemorrhage(4 months)
  • Neurological impairment(4 months)
  • Infarct in new territory(4 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验