Effects of Skeletally Anchored Maxillary Expander Via Two Approaches of Microosteoperforations
Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
- Conditions
- Posterior Crossbite
- Interventions
- Device: skeletally anchored maxillary expander
- Registration Number
- NCT05433038
- Lead Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Brief Summary
study will be directed to evaluate two approaches of microosteoperforations during skeletally anchored maxillary expansion
- Detailed Description
Dento-skeletal effects of skeletally anchored maxillary expander assisted with two approaches of microosteoperforations.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
-
All patients should satisfy the following criteria:-
- An age range from 18-22.
- Transverse maxillary deficiency.
- Crossbite (unilateral or bilateral)
- No previous orthodontic treatment.
- Good oral and general health.
- No systemic disease/ medication that could interfere with OTM.
Exclusion Criteria
- History of systemic and medical illness.
- History of extraction of permanent teeth.
- Previos orthodontic treatment.
- Poor oral hygiene or periodontally compromised patient.
- Patient with craniofacial anomaly or previous history of trauma,bruxism or parafunctions.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description skeletal expander with microosteoperforation in mid palatine skeletally anchored maxillary expander group1.will include ten patients undergo skeletally anchored maxillary expander with microosteoperforation in mid palatine suture skeletal expander with microosteoperforation in mid palatine and buccally skeletally anchored maxillary expander group2.will include ten patients undergo skeletally anchored maxillary expander with microosteoperforation in mid palatine suture and buccally
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method skeletally transverse measurement from start of treatment until study completion an average of 1 year using cone beam computed tomography
dentolinear measurement from start of treatment until study completion an average of 1 year using cone beam computed tomography
dentoangular measurement from start of treatment until study completion an average of 1 year using cone beam computed tomography
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Al-Azhar univesity
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt