Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01888874
NCT01888874CompletedPhase 2

Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Phase IIb Dose Finding Study of GLPG0634 Administered for 24 Weeks in Combination With Methotrexate to Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate Alone

Galapagos NV142 sites in 6 countries599 target enrollmentStarted: July 17, 2013Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Completed
Enrollment
599
Locations
142
Primary Endpoint
Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 12

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Participants suffering from active rheumatoid arthritis despite continued treatment with methotrexate were evaluated for improvement of disease activity (efficacy) when taking GLPG0634 (3 different doses - 50 milligram [mg], 100 mg and 200 mg daily -, each evaluated as once daily [QD] and twice daily [BID] regimen) or matching placebo for 24 weeks.

•During the course of the study, patients were also examined for any side effects that could occur (safety and tolerability), and the amount of GLPG0634 present in the blood (Pharmacokinetics) as well as the effects of GLPG0634 on disease- and mechanism of action-related parameters in the blood (Pharmacodynamics) were determined. Also, the effects of different doses and dose regiments of GLPG0634 administration on participants' disability, fatigue, and quality of life were evaluated.

Detailed Description

  • Treatment duration was 24 weeks in total.
  • However, at Week 12, participants on placebo who did not achieve a 20% improvement in swollen joint count(SJC66) and tender joint count (TJC68) were re-randomized (automatically via interactive voice/web response [IXRS]) to treatment to receive GLPG0634 100 mg QD or 50 mg BID doses in a blinded fashion, participants on 50 mg QD who had not achieved a 20% improvement in SJC66 and TJC68 were assigned to 100 mg QD and participants on 25 mg BID. who did not achieve a 20% improvement in SJC66 and TJC68 were assigned to 50 mg BID. All continued the study until Week 24.
  • Participants in the other groups maintained their randomized treatment until Week 24.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • have a diagnosis of RA since at least 6 months and meeting the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria of RA and ACR functional class I-III,
  • have ≥6 swollen joints (from a 66 joint count) and ≥8 tender joints (from a 68 joint count) at Screening and at Baseline,
  • Screening serum c-reactive protein ≥0.7 x upper limit of laboratory normal range (ULN),
  • have received MTX for ≥6 months and have been on a stable dose (15 to 25 mg/week) of MTX for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening and willing to continue on their current regimen for the duration of the study. Stable doses of MTX as low as 10 mg/week are allowed when there is documented evidence of intolerance or safety issues at higher doses.

Exclusion Criteria

  • current therapy with any disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) other than MTX,
  • current or previous RA treatment with a biologic DMARD, with the exception of biologic DMARDs administered in a single clinical study setting more than 6 months prior to Screening (12 months for rituximab or other B cell depleting agents), where the biologic DMARD was effective, and if discontinued, this should not be due to lack of efficacy,
  • previous treatment at any time with a cytotoxic agent, other than MTX, before Screening.

Arms & Interventions

Placebo

Placebo Comparator

Participants received GLPG0634 matching placebo capsules, orally, twice daily (BID) during Weeks 1 to 12. Participants who were responders (having at least 20 percent [%] improvement on TJC68 and SJC66) remained on placebo while nonresponders were re-randomized to GLPG0634 100 milligram (mg) once daily (QD) or 50 mg BID during Weeks 13 to 24.

Intervention: Placebo (Drug)

GLPG0634 50 mg QD

Experimental

Participants received GLPG0634 50 mg capsules, orally, QD during Weeks 1 to 12. Participants who were responders (having at least 20% improvement on TJC68 and SJC66) remained on 50 mg QD while nonresponders were re-randomized to 100 mg QD during Weeks 13 to 24.

Intervention: GLPG0634 (Drug)

GLPG0634 100 mg QD

Experimental

Participants received GLPG0634 100 mg capsules, orally, QD during Weeks 1 to 24.

Intervention: GLPG0634 (Drug)

GLPG0634 200 mg QD

Experimental

Participants received GLPG0634 200 mg capsules, orally, QD during Weeks 1 to 24.

Intervention: GLPG0634 (Drug)

GLPG0634 100 mg BID

Experimental

Participants received GLPG0634 100 mg capsules, orally, BID during Weeks 1 to 24.

Intervention: GLPG0634 (Drug)

GLPG0634 25 mg BID

Experimental

Participants received GLPG0634 25 mg capsules, orally, BID during Weeks 1 to 12. Participants who were responders (having at least 20% improvement on TJC68 and SJC66) remained on 25 mg BID while nonresponders were re-randomized to 50 mg BID during Weeks 13 to 24.

Intervention: GLPG0634 (Drug)

GLPG0634 50 mg BID

Experimental

Participants received GLPG0634 50 mg capsules, orally, BID during Weeks 1 to 24.

Intervention: GLPG0634 (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of Participants Achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 12

Time Frame: Week 12

The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response is a measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. The ACR20 response is defined as: 1) ≥ 20% improvement from baseline in SJC66, and 2) ≥ 20% improvement from baseline in tender TJC68, and 3) ≥ 20% improvement from baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 items: 1. Pain visual analog scale (VAS) (taken from the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]), 2. Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, 3. Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS, 4. Total HAQ-DI score, and 5. CRP. Non-responder imputation was used (ie, to impute a missing response, the participant was assumed to be a non-responder).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR20 Response at Week 24(Week 24)
  • Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24(Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24)
  • Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24(Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24)
  • ACR N% Improvement (ACR-N) Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24(Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24)
  • Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Corrected for CRP (DAS28 (CRP)) European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24(Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24)
  • Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR/EULAR Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24(Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24)
  • Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24(Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24)
  • Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24(Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24)
  • Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) at Weeks 4, 12, and 24(Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24)
  • Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Scores at Weeks 4, 12, and 24(Baseline and Weeks 4, 12, and 24)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (142)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Dose-finding Study of GLPG0634 as add-on... | Clinical Trial