A Registry of Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Using Stapling Devices: Observation of Safety and Clinical Efficacy
- Conditions
- ObesityRoux-en-Y Gastric BypassGastrostomyNissen Sleeve
- Interventions
- Device: easyEndoTM Universal Linear Cutting Stapler and reloads (Ezisurg Medical)
- Registration Number
- NCT04808206
- Lead Sponsor
- Duomed
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this observational registry is to evaluate the safety and the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic bariatric surgery using stapling devices (easyEndoTM Universal Linear Cutting Stapler and reloads from Ezisurg Medical). The goal of the study will be achieved by reporting peri- and postoperative complications and the clinical outcome after surgery in a prospectively maintained database.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 150
- Patient ≥ 18 years of age at registry entry
- Patient and investigator signed and dated the informed consent form prior to the index-procedure.
- Patient has a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, with one or more related co-morbidities.
- Patient has a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2.
- Patient is eligible for laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
- Patient is unable/unwilling to provide informed consent.
- Patient has a history of bariatric surgery.
- Patient is unable to comply with the registry protocol or the proposed follow-up visits.
- Patient has a contra-indication for laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Obese patients eligible for laparoscopic bariatric surgery easyEndoTM Universal Linear Cutting Stapler and reloads (Ezisurg Medical) -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Safety of laparoscopic bariatric surgery using stapling devices (easyEndoTM Universal Linear Cutting Stapler and reloads - Ezisurg Medical) Follow-up 4: 24 months after the procedure Number of re-interventions and number of participants with (serious) adverse events ≥ grade II Clavien-Dindo.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical efficacy - weight loss Follow-up 4: 24 months after the procedure Weight loss
Device performance At index procedure Scoring of: easy of intra-abdominal device positioning, grasping/climbing force, sharpness of the blades, staple-line formation, device stability, device maneuverability, device consistency and reliability, ergonomic design, hemostasis. Each of the aforementioned items receives a score from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating that the user is very unsatisfied and 4 indicating that the user is very satisfied.
Number of participants with a post-operative change of cormorbidities Follow-up 4: 24 months after the procedure Comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease, coronary arterial disease, sleep disordered breathing, hypertension, dyslipidemia, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, asthma, congestive heart failure, degenerative joint disease, gastroesophageal reflux, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, use of immunosuppressants) 24 months after the surgical procedure as compared to the patients' comorbidities at baseline.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, campus St.-Jan
🇧🇪Genk, Belgium
Hôpital de Nivelles, groupe Jolimont
🇧🇪Haine-Saint-Paul, Belgium
Ziekenhuis Maas en Kempen
🇧🇪Maaseik, Belgium