Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02159508
NCT02159508UnknownNot Applicable

An Intervention Study Comparing Intensive Nutrition Counselling With On-demand Counselling in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy

Helsinki University Central Hospital1 site in 1 country65 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2007Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
65
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Nutritional status

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of a pre-planned patient-adjusted intensive nutritional counselling given by a dietitian several times during (chemo)radiotherapy vs. individualized nutritional counselling given by a dietitian once in the beginning of (chemo)radiotherapy and thereafter on-demand in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Detailed Description

  • A sample size of 102 patients was identified to achieve 30% reduction in prevalence of malnutrition at the end of treatment (50% to 20%), with a significance value of 5% (p < 0.05), 90% power. The second calculation was for a sample size of 88 patients for 30% reduction in prevalence of malnutrition at the end of treatment (50% to 20%) with the significance value 5% (p<0.05), 85% power and effect size 70%. Based on these numbers, our aim is to recruit 100 patients, with the assumption that 12% patients would be lost to follow up.
  • Randomization will be performed by the minimization procedure with the Minim Program® (http://www-users.york.ac.uk/\~mb55/guide/randsery.htm). The allocation will be done according to the following criteria: 1) Stage I-II vs. Stage III-IV; 2) age <65 vs. >=65 year; 3) Body Mass Index <20 vs. >=20 kg/m2 and 4) tumour location (oral cavity-oropharynx-tonsils vs. hypopharynx-larynx vs. nasopharynx).
  • Adverse events of chemoradiotherapy will be classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events-3.0 (CTCAE v3.0)
  • Nutritional status will be assessed by patient-generated subjective global assessment, nutritional risk screening-2002, upper-arm anthropometry (MAC, triceps skinfold thickness, MAMA), Bio-impedance, hand grip strength and weight loss.
  • Survival: overall survival, disease-specific survival and disease-free survival are calculated.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Clinical diagnosis of primary locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx, nasopharynx or larynx

Exclusion Criteria

  • •renal function impairment
  • •liver insufficiency
  • •heart failure
  • •pulmonal impairment
  • •Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • •cognitive impairment
  • •previous cancer in any location
  • •terminal stage

Arms & Interventions

Individualised on-demand counselling

No Intervention

Individualized on-demand counselling group was assigned to receive baseline nutritional counselling, that consisted of one dietetic consultation before (chemo)radiotherapy. During (chemo)radiotherapy on-demand counselling group patients received further counselling only on demand.

Intensive nutritional counselling

Experimental

Intensive nutritional counselling consisted of protocolled counselling given by a dietitian once at baseline and on the 2nd and 4th week of treatment and at the end of chemoradiotherapy.

Intervention: Nutritional counselling (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Nutritional status

Time Frame: 6 months

Nutritional status was assessed by patient-generated subjective global assessment and anthropometry.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Survival(5 year)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Helena Orell-Kotikangas

Dietitian

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials