Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06308809
NCT06308809UnknownNot Applicable

Effect of PNF Training as an Intervention for Functional Ankle Instability in College Student

Ma Shuzhen0 sites30 target enrollmentStarted: March 30, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
30
Primary Endpoint
Lower limb stability test

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The lower limb stability test was carried out by MicroSwing 6.0 gravity center moving trajectory tester made in Germany.

Detailed Description

The test steps and methods are as follows:

  1. Before the test, arrange the subjects to be familiar with the lower limb stability test system and test environment, and master the test method.
  2. The subject stands barefoot and one foot in the center of the center of gravity movement trajectory tester, with his hands placed on his sides naturally, and maintains his body balance for 30 seconds.
  3. Record data of the test system.
  4. The measurement was repeated three times with a time interval of 5min. Collect the test data of the center of gravity moving trajectory tester, including swing frequency, coordination coefficient and stability coefficient, and get the best results of the three tests. The smaller the oscillation frequency and coordination coefficient are within a certain range, the better the stability is. The greater the value of stability coefficient is within a certain range, the better the stability is.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

Single (Participant)

- Page 2 of 5 [DRAFT] -In order to avoid mutual interference between the experimental group and the control group, a blinding method needs to be used in the study. In this study, a single blind experiment will be conducted to blind the participating athletes.

During the sample grouping process, participating athletes will not know the specific grouping situation.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 23 Years (Adult)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Unilateral functional ankle instability;
  • •Have not received formal rehabilitation treatment or informal rehabilitation treatment within the past month;
  • •Voluntarily accept the treatment in this study and ensure to complete the training tasks arranged by the therapist;
  • •Aged between 18 and 23 years old;

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Does not meet the above diagnostic criteria;
  • •Ankle pain caused by infectious diseases;
  • •suffering from severe neurological diseases;
  • •Soft tissue damage near the ankle joint;
  • •Other joints outside the ankle are unstable.

Arms & Interventions

Control training group

Other

The control group will follow the curriculum standards set by the Sports University.

Intervention: PNF training (Other)

PNF training group

Experimental

The experimental group will undergo 60 minutes of PNF training.

Intervention: PNF training (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Lower limb stability test

Time Frame: Baseline, post-test after 8 weeks

The lower limb stability test was carried out by MicroSwing 6.0 gravity center moving trajectory tester made in Germany. The test steps and methods are as follows: 1. Before the test, arrange the subjects to be familiar with the lower limb stability test system and test environment, and master the test method. 2. The subject stands barefoot and one foot in the center of the center of gravity movement trajectory tester, with his hands placed on his sides naturally, and maintains his body balance for 30 seconds. 3. Record data of the test system. 4. The measurement was repeated three times with a time interval of 5min. Collect the test data of the center of gravity moving trajectory tester, including swing frequency, coordination coefficient and stability coefficient, and get the best results of the three tests.

Star offset balance test

Time Frame: Baseline, post-test after 8 weeks

The subjects stood in the center of the star chart with the affected side foot as the supporting foot, with bare feet and one foot in the center. The healthy side foot was extended forward, outward front, outer front, outer back, back, inner back, inner and inner front respectively to the farthest distance as far as possible. The supporting foot was extended in the counterclockwise direction when the left foot was used, and the supporting foot was extended in the clockwise direction when the right foot was used. The subject withdrew the non-supporting foot and resumed standing with both feet and rested for 5 seconds. The data of each extension of the subject was recorded, and the farthest score was measured three times. The furthest results in each direction were standardized with the subjects' lower limb length, and the data were recorded. (4) The furthest scores in each direction were standardized with the subjects' lower limb length, and the data were recorded.

CAIT score

Time Frame: Baseline, post-test after 8 weeks

CAIT consists of 9 questions with a total of 30 points, scoring ≦27 points for diagnosis of functional ankle instability, 28 points and above for diagnosis of non-functional ankle instability. 1. Before issuing the questionnaire, explain the contents of the questionnaire to the subjects in detail, and the subjects fill in the questionnaire truthfully according to their own situation. 2. The CAIT score of the subjects was calculated and recorded. 3. If you fill in the questionnaire incorrectly, you need to fill it again and keep a record

Muscle strength test

Time Frame: Baseline, post-test after 8 weeks

MicroFET2 hand-held muscle strength tester made in Germany was used for muscle strength test. The test steps and methods are as follows: 1. Before the test, arrange the subjects to be familiar with the handheld muscle strength test system and test environment, and master the test method. 2. The subject took off his shoes and socks and lay on his back on the recovery bed with his hands naturally placed on his chest. The muscle strength of the subject's dorsalis, plantar flexus, varus and valgus were tested respectively. 3. Record data of the test system. 4. The measurement was repeated 5 times in each direction of movement. The test data of handheld muscle strength tester were collected, including the muscle strength of ankle dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, varus and valgus, and the best results of 5 tests were obtained.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Ma Shuzhen
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ma Shuzhen

Principal Investigator

Universiti Putra Malaysia

Similar Trials