A Randomized Trial in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Comparing the Order of Treatment With Epidural Corticosteroid Injections and Physical Therapy

Emory University1 site in 1 countryJanuary 2014

ConditionsLumbar Spinal Stenosis

Interventionsphysical therapy lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection epidural steroid injection

Drugsepidural steroid injection

Overview

Phase: Not Applicable
Intervention: physical therapy
Conditions: Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Sponsor: Emory University
Locations: 1
Primary Endpoint: Oswestry disability Index
Status: Withdrawn
Last Updated: 9 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Arms & Interventions Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

Patients with back pain with spinal stenosis of the lower back will be asked to volunteer for this research study. These patients don't need immediate surgery for this problem. Treatment of this kind of back pain with spinal stenosis usually includes physical therapy exercises and steroid injections. Both treatments are usually helpful in patients with back pain with spinal stenosis. However, physicians and other healthcare providers don't know which treatment is better to give first. The purpose of this research is to answer that question. Patients enrolled in this study will receive both treatments: physical therapy (PT) and a steroid injection ("shot"). However, patients may get the shot first followed by PT, or they may have PT first, followed by the shot. Their time in this study will last up to 6 months, and there will be five outcome measurements (via visits or telephone). All study visits will take place at the Atlanta VA Medical Center (Atlanta VA). Investigators hope to enroll about 120 subjects from the Atlanta VA. Enrolled patients will be randomized using a randomization computer program.

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

January 2014

End Date

December 2017

Last Updated

9 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Study Design

Crossover

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Emory University

Responsible Party

Principal Investigator

Hassan Monfared MD

Assistant Professor, Program Director

Emory University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•chronic low back pain (at least 3 months in duration), a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) greater than 30 (on a 100 point scale), between the ages of 18 to 80 years, either without radiating leg pain (below the knees) or with low back and/or buttock pain greater than leg pain (in which case the VAS for leg pain must be 20 or less), ability to read English and complete the assessment instruments, and diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis by a board certified radiologist or a board certified physiatrist either by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed-tomography (CT) that has previously been done as part of a normal course of patients medical treatment. All underlying etiology or diagnoses that are the source for lumbar spinal stenosis will be recorded (e.g. spondylolisthesis, herniated or degenerative discs, spondylosis).

Exclusion Criteria

•history of lumbar surgery, acute disc herniation as reported on a radiologic imaging report, acute or severe chronic illness that are unstable, cognitive impairment which prevents the patient from providing accurate data or giving informed consent, neurological conditions (e.g. stroke, Parkinson's, brain injury), lower extremity amputees, fibromyalgia or chronic generalized pain, unstable opioid use or any signs or evidence of alcohol dependence or illicit drug use (as determined by screening questionnaire), clinical suspicion of facet joint-originating back pain or a positive response to prior facet joint block, lumbar epidural steroid injections within the last 6 months, uncontrolled psychiatric disorders, serious concomitant medical illness (e.g. acute heart failure, acute renal failure) or severe pain that may impair patient's ability to participate in physical therapy exercises or pain that is deemed so severe such that withholding of an ESI until after completion of the PT exercises is seen as causing unreasonable suffering to the patient, and conditions that would prevent the patient from undergoing fluoroscopy (e.g. pregnancy).