跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02288949
NCT02288949已完成不适用

STratification AND Outcome of Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Dr. Negrin University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2013年9月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
300
试验地点
1
主要终点
range of values of variables associated with the highest or lowest mortality

研究概览

简要总结

The American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) and the Berlin definitions of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) could be adequate for epidemiologic studies, but it is not adequate for inclusion of patients into therapeutic clinical trials. Despite recent reports on the effects of standardized ventilator settings on PaO2/FIO2 and fulfillment of AECC and Berlin definitions of ARDS, it is still a matter of debate whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours is the most appropriate tool for stratifying lung severity in patients with ARDS. The investigators will perform an observational, multicenter, prospective audit in a network of intensive care units in Spain and China for validating and confirming that the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours after ARDS onset is the most valuable tool for stratifying and predicting outcome in patients with ARDS.

详细描述

In 1994, the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) defined ARDS as follows: 1) acute and sudden onset of severe respiratory distress, 2) bilateral infiltrates on frontal chest radiograph, 3) absence of left atrial hypertension or no clinical signs of left heart failure, and 4) severe hypoxemia, as PaO2/FiO2 ratio <200 mmHg, regardless of FIO2 or PEEP levels. Although this definition could be adequate for epidemiologic studies, it is not adequate for inclusion of patients into therapeutic clinical trials. In 2012, a proposal for updating the ARDS definition (the Berlin criteria) was published and an empirical classification was proposed according to three PaO2/FiO2 cut-off values at ARDS onset: severe (≤100 mmHg), moderate (>100-≤200), and mild (>200-≤300) on PEEP≥5 cmH2O. However, despite that there is sufficient evidence about the interactions between PEEP and FiO2, the Berlin criteria did not mandate the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours under standarized guidelines.

The PaO2/FIO2 can be easily manipulated. Alterations in PEEP and FIO2 can dramatically change the PaO2/FIO2. Despite recent reports on the effects of standardized ventilator settings on PaO2/FIO2 and fulfillment of AECC definitions of ARDS, it is still a matter of debate whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 hours is the most appropriate tool for stratifying lung severity in patients with ARDS.

The investigators will examine whether the assessment of hypoxemia at 24 h after ARDS diagnosis under standard guidelines for ventilatory management have an impact on the stratification of lung severity and on predicting mortality of ARDS patients in the intensive care unit.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients meeting the AECC definition for ARDS on PEEP greater or equal than 5 cmH2O (or the Berlin criteria for moderate and severe ARDS).

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

range of values of variables associated with the highest or lowest mortality

时间窗: within the first 24 h of ARDS onset

次要结局

  • stratification by risk of death based on variables associated with worst outcome(ICU stay)

研究者

发起方
Dr. Negrin University Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Jesus Villar

Director, Multidisciplinary Organ Dysfunction Evaluation Research Network

Dr. Negrin University Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验