Optimal Adalimumab Plasma Concentrations in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Interventions
- Other: The study is observational
- Registration Number
- NCT04875299
- Lead Sponsor
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
- Brief Summary
The optimal plasma concentration range of adalimumab in Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis remains unknown, the aims of this study is to determine the concentration-effect relationship, and explore the effect of anti-drug antibody or biomarkers on clinical outcomes in a real-world setting.
- Detailed Description
This prospective observational study will include Chinese adult patients with active ankylosing spondylitis receiving adalimumab treatment. The primary outcome is the mean change from baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 480
- Consent of the patient.
- Patient who meets the definition of Ankylosing Spondylitis based on the 1984 Modified New York Criteria, has a diagnosis of active Ankylosing Spondylitis (BASDAI ≥ 4, Back pain ≥ 4).
- Patients who have indication of adalimumab.
- Patients on NSAIDs treatment need to be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks.
(1) Hepatitis B or tuberculosis patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description adalimumab TDM The study is observational Patients with active ankylosing spondylitis receiving adalimumab treatment.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Change From Baseline in ASDAS Week 24 ASDAS will be measured at week 24 and will be compared to baseline
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ASAS20 response Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) subjects. ASAS has 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20 = 20% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute improvement ≥ 10 units on a 0-100 scale (0 = no disease activity; 100 = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (defined as a worsening of ≥ 20% and a net worsening of ≥ 10 units) in the remaining domain.
ASAS40 response Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 ASAS 40 = 40% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute improvement ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 scale (0 = no disease activity; 100 = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (defined as a worsening of ≥ 20% and a net worsening of ≥ 10 units) in the remaining domain.
BASDAI50 response Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) subjects answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain, fatigue, and morning stiffness. BASDAI 50 = at least 50% improvement (vs. baseline) in BASDAI.
ASDAS response Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 A decrease in ASDAS from baseline (△ASDAS) ≥ 2.0 or a moderate disease activity achievement (ASDAS \< 2.1) with △ASDAS ≥ 1.1 is considered as response
ASDAS remission Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 ASDAS \< 2.1 at assessment time point is considered as remission
Safety analysis - Occurence of adverse event Week 24 Safety analysis include occurence of adverse event
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
🇨🇳Suzhou, Jiangsu, China