MedPath

Optimal Adalimumab Plasma Concentrations in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients

Conditions
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Interventions
Other: The study is observational
Registration Number
NCT04875299
Lead Sponsor
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Brief Summary

The optimal plasma concentration range of adalimumab in Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis remains unknown, the aims of this study is to determine the concentration-effect relationship, and explore the effect of anti-drug antibody or biomarkers on clinical outcomes in a real-world setting.

Detailed Description

This prospective observational study will include Chinese adult patients with active ankylosing spondylitis receiving adalimumab treatment. The primary outcome is the mean change from baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
480
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Consent of the patient.
  2. Patient who meets the definition of Ankylosing Spondylitis based on the 1984 Modified New York Criteria, has a diagnosis of active Ankylosing Spondylitis (BASDAI ≥ 4, Back pain ≥ 4).
  3. Patients who have indication of adalimumab.
  4. Patients on NSAIDs treatment need to be on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria

(1) Hepatitis B or tuberculosis patients

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
adalimumab TDMThe study is observationalPatients with active ankylosing spondylitis receiving adalimumab treatment.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change From Baseline in ASDASWeek 24

ASDAS will be measured at week 24 and will be compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ASAS20 responseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 24

ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) subjects. ASAS has 4 domains: patient global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20 = 20% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute improvement ≥ 10 units on a 0-100 scale (0 = no disease activity; 100 = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (defined as a worsening of ≥ 20% and a net worsening of ≥ 10 units) in the remaining domain.

ASAS40 responseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 24

ASAS 40 = 40% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute improvement ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 scale (0 = no disease activity; 100 = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening (defined as a worsening of ≥ 20% and a net worsening of ≥ 10 units) in the remaining domain.

BASDAI50 responseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 24

Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) subjects answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain, fatigue, and morning stiffness. BASDAI 50 = at least 50% improvement (vs. baseline) in BASDAI.

ASDAS responseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 24

A decrease in ASDAS from baseline (△ASDAS) ≥ 2.0 or a moderate disease activity achievement (ASDAS \< 2.1) with △ASDAS ≥ 1.1 is considered as response

ASDAS remissionWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 24

ASDAS \< 2.1 at assessment time point is considered as remission

Safety analysis - Occurence of adverse eventWeek 24

Safety analysis include occurence of adverse event

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

🇨🇳

Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath