MedPath

Ultrasound-Guided Aspiration of PTA vs Conventional Landmark Technique - a RCT

Not Applicable
Conditions
Peritonsillar Abscess
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: Intraoral ultrasound
Procedure: The landmark technique
Registration Number
NCT03824288
Lead Sponsor
Tobias Todsen
Brief Summary

The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at two different centers at the Department of ORL - Head \& Neck Surgery, Odense University Hospital and the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery \& Audiology, Rigshospitalet.

The research question is:

In a group of patients referred to an otolaryngology department with objective findings of peritonsillar abscess, what are the effects of using intraoral ultrasound to diagnose and guide needle aspiration compared to the traditional landmark-based technique, when measured by the number of performed needle aspirations, procedure-related pain and days on sick leave?

The secondary outcomes measured are

* Number of hospitalization days

* Number of Quincy tonsillectomies

* Number of visits to an outpatient clinic

* Patient-reported outcome (measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale)

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
88
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Ultrasound-guided aspirationIntraoral ultrasoundAn intraoral ultrasound is conducted with a Burr-Hole N11C5s transducer (BK Ultrasound) and if an abscess cavity is suspected, an ultrasound-guided aspiration is performed with an in-plane needle guide attached to guide the needle.
The landmark techniqueThe landmark techniquePTA a needle aspiration attempted according to the landmark technique is conducted. If the initial aspiration is unsuccessful, two additional attempts are made in the middle and lower pole of the tonsil.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
needle aspirationsFrom date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.

total number of needle aspirations performed

proportion of succesfull needle aspirationsFrom date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.

proportion of needle aspirations with aspiration of pus

days on sick leaveFrom date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.

Total number of days on sick leave after first intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of hospitalization daysFrom date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
Patient-reported outcomeFrom date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.

Patients are asked to choose one number, on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain), corresponding to the intensity of their pain - meassured using a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-11).

Number of visits in outpatient clinicUntil full recovery from peritonsilar infection
Number of quincy tonsillectomiesFrom date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Rigshospitalet

🇩🇰

Copenhagen, Copenhagen East, Denmark

Odense University Hospital

🇩🇰

Odense, Odense C, Denmark

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath