Ultrasound-Guided Aspiration of PTA vs Conventional Landmark Technique - a RCT
- Conditions
- Peritonsillar Abscess
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: Intraoral ultrasoundProcedure: The landmark technique
- Registration Number
- NCT03824288
- Lead Sponsor
- Tobias Todsen
- Brief Summary
The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at two different centers at the Department of ORL - Head \& Neck Surgery, Odense University Hospital and the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery \& Audiology, Rigshospitalet.
The research question is:
In a group of patients referred to an otolaryngology department with objective findings of peritonsillar abscess, what are the effects of using intraoral ultrasound to diagnose and guide needle aspiration compared to the traditional landmark-based technique, when measured by the number of performed needle aspirations, procedure-related pain and days on sick leave?
The secondary outcomes measured are
* Number of hospitalization days
* Number of Quincy tonsillectomies
* Number of visits to an outpatient clinic
* Patient-reported outcome (measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 88
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Ultrasound-guided aspiration Intraoral ultrasound An intraoral ultrasound is conducted with a Burr-Hole N11C5s transducer (BK Ultrasound) and if an abscess cavity is suspected, an ultrasound-guided aspiration is performed with an in-plane needle guide attached to guide the needle. The landmark technique The landmark technique PTA a needle aspiration attempted according to the landmark technique is conducted. If the initial aspiration is unsuccessful, two additional attempts are made in the middle and lower pole of the tonsil.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method needle aspirations From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months. total number of needle aspirations performed
proportion of succesfull needle aspirations From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months. proportion of needle aspirations with aspiration of pus
days on sick leave From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months. Total number of days on sick leave after first intervention
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of hospitalization days From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months. Patient-reported outcome From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months. Patients are asked to choose one number, on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain), corresponding to the intensity of their pain - meassured using a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-11).
Number of visits in outpatient clinic Until full recovery from peritonsilar infection Number of quincy tonsillectomies From date of randomization until the date of full recovery from the treated peritonsilar infection, assessed up to 1 months.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Rigshospitalet
🇩🇰Copenhagen, Copenhagen East, Denmark
Odense University Hospital
🇩🇰Odense, Odense C, Denmark