COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL WITH MANUAL CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION IN CARDIAC ARREST PATIENTS IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- 1. To compare the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in mechanical with
研究概览
简要总结
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation with manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients presenting with cardiac arrest in the emergency department. High quality chest compressions are essential for improving survival in cardiac arrest. Manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation may vary depending on rescuer fatigue and technique, whereas mechanical devices provide automated and consistent chest compressions.
The objective of this study is to evaluate return of spontaneous circulation, survival outcomes, and immediate clinical parameters in patients receiving mechanical versus manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study will be conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. Eligible adult patients with cardiac arrest will be included as per predefined criteria.
The findings of this study may help determine whether mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation offers any clinical advantage over conventional manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in emergency settings and may guide future resuscitation practices.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •adults patients more than 18 years of age non traumatic cardiac arrest.
排除标准
- •Patients with known Do Not Resuscitate status.
- •Pregnant patients.
- •Prisoner patients and medico-legal case.
- •Patients who previously received either mechanical or manual cardio-pulmonary resuscitation before presenting to emergency.
- •5.Trauma patients with cardiac arrest.
- •Patient does not fit into the mechanical cardio-pulmonary resuscitation device 7 No trained staff in the deployment of a mechanical cardio-pulmonary resuscitation device in attendance.
结局指标
主要结局
1. To compare the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in mechanical with
时间窗: 1.TIME TAKEN 10 MINUTES 20 MINUTES | 2.30 Days outcome
manual cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in adult cardiac arrest patients in
时间窗: 1.TIME TAKEN 10 MINUTES 20 MINUTES | 2.30 Days outcome
emergency department.
时间窗: 1.TIME TAKEN 10 MINUTES 20 MINUTES | 2.30 Days outcome
次要结局
- 1. To compare time taken to achieve Return of spontaneous circulation in mechanical(with manual cardio-pulmonary resuscitation.)
研究者
DRVIVEK
A.B.V.I.M.S AND DR.RML HOSPITAL