MedPath

Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Dental Wear
Dental Decay
Interventions
Device: Modeling Resin
Registration Number
NCT06485024
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

the study will be conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of direct Nanohybrid resin composite veneer restorations applied with or without modeling resin

Detailed Description

ChatGPT This study aims to investigate the impact of modeling resin on the clinical performance of direct nanohybrid resin composite veneer restorations in anterior teeth. Resin composites are widely used in dental restorations due to their aesthetic qualities, but issues like discoloration and surface roughness can affect their longevity and patient satisfaction. Modeling resin, used to aid in composite placement and sculpting, has become common, but concerns exist regarding its effects on composite properties, particularly long-term color stability.

The research will employ a randomized controlled trial design with a two-arm parallel approach. Adult patients (18-45 years) with anterior tooth defects suitable for composite veneer restoration will be recruited. The intervention group will receive nanohybrid resin composite with modeling resin, while the comparator group will receive the composite without modeling resin. Outcomes will be assessed using modified USPHS criteria, including color stability, color match, anatomical form, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, retention rate, presence of secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity, at baseline and at follow-up intervals of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

Statistical analysis will involve independent t-tests for intergroup comparisons and repeated measures ANOVA for intragroup comparisons, with a significance level set at 0.05. The study aims to determine if the use of modeling resin influences the clinical outcomes of resin composite veneer restorations. Ethics approval will be obtained, and confidentiality of participant data will be strictly maintained throughout the study period.

Overall, this research seeks to provide insights into optimizing the application of resin composites in dental practice to enhance patient outcomes and satisfaction

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
25
Inclusion Criteria
  • • Adults (18-45Ys) with anterior tooth defects indicated for direct composite veneer restoration.

    • Males or females.
    • Community-dwelling
    • Have all his/her anterior teeth with sufficient enamel structure
    • With ≥ 1 anterior tooth defect
    • Have sufficient cognitive ability to understand consent procedures
    • Anterior tooth defect indicated for direct composite veneer
    • Vital upper or lower anterior teeth with no signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
    • Mobility grade: no clinical mobility
    • Plaque index ≤ 2
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients younger than 18 or older than 45 years old • Disabilities.
  • Systemic diseases or severe medically compromised.
  • Lack of compliance.
  • Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching or temporomandibular joint disorders.
  • Cognitive impairment

Periapical pathosis or signs of pulpal pathology.

  • Malocclusion
  • Possible prosthodontic restoration within 1 year.
  • Non-vital tooth.
  • Endodontically treated tooth.
  • Severe periodontal affection or tooth indicated for extraction.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
comparatorModeling Resinthe regular application of the NanoHybrid composite as a direct anterior veneer restoration
interventionModeling Resinthe use of Modeling resin as the last layer applied to the NanoHybrid composite direct veneer
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
comparison of Color stability with and without the interventionbaseline and after one year

by using Spectrophotometer to measure the color considering the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
comparing the effect of the intervention on color matchbaseline and after one year

using the modefied USPHS criteria

comparing the effect of the intervention on surface texturebaseline and after one year

using the modefied USPHS criteria

comparing the effect of the intervention on marginal adaptationbaseline and after one year

using the modefied USPHS criteria

comparing the effect of the intervention on recurrent cariesbaseline and after one year

using the modefied USPHS criteria

comparing the effect of the intervention on postoperative sensitivitybaseline and after one year

using the modefied USPHS criteria

comparing the effect of the intervention on anatomical formbaseline and after one year

using the modefied USPHS criteria

comparing the effect of the intervention on marginal discolorationbaseline and after one year

using the modefied USPHS criteria

comparing the effect of the intervention on retention ratebaseline and after one year

using the modefied USPHS criteria

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath