Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00540020
NCT00540020
Completed
Not Applicable

Rehabilitation of Traumatic Brain Injury in Active Duty Military Personnel and Veterans: DVBIC Randomized Clinical Trial of Two Rehabilitation Approaches

The Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center0 sites360 target enrollmentJuly 1996

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Traumatic Brain Injury
Sponsor
The Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center
Enrollment
360
Primary Endpoint
(1) Functional independence (i.e., ability to live independently with less than 3 hours of assistance per week) (2) Return to work/school (i.e., paid employment or school enrollment, either full or part time)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
18 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Context: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common condition associated with significant long-term cognitive, behavioral, and functional morbidities. There are minimal controlled efficacy data of various acute rehabilitation intervention approaches.

Objective: To determine the relative efficacy of two different acute TBI rehabilitation approaches - cognitive-didactic versus functional-experiential. Secondarily to determine relative efficacy for different patient subpopulations based on baseline cognitive functioning.

Detailed Description

A randomly assigned, intent-to-treat model of two different comprehensive treatment programs conducted between July 19 1996 and May 16, 2003 in 360 adult participants with moderate to severe TBI treated in four participating Veterans Administration TBI rehabilitation centers. All patients admitted to the Commission for Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) accredited acute inpatient rehabilitation brain injury programs at 4 participating Veterans Administration Medical Centers (VAMCs) (Minneapolis, Palo Alto, Richmond, and Tampa) during the study enrollment period were screened for eligibility. The design was a randomized-controlled trial with two treatment arms (cognitive-didactic and functional-experiential), both embedded within an interdisciplinary TBI rehabilitation program. All treatment was hospital based. The interactive nature of the experimental conditions precluded subject blinding. Since each participating site serves a wide geographic area, the protocol permitted post-hospital outcome assessments by structured telephonic interview, to minimize drop out. Participants completed baseline assessment then received by random assignment one of the two standardized protocol rehabilitation programs (summarized below and described in detail elsewhere). Participants received 1.5 to 2.5 hours daily of protocol-specific therapy plus another 2 to 2.5 hours daily of occupational and physical therapy. Independent teams of therapists functioned at each site to deliver the separate treatments and by necessity were not blinded to treatment. Protocol monitoring site visits, biweekly conference calls, and biannual investigator meetings were conducted to ensure uniformity of protocol treatment over time.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 1996
End Date
May 2003
Last Updated
18 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
The Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • moderate-to-severe closed head injury, manifested by a post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 12 or less, or coma of 12 hours or more , or posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) of 24 hours or more, and/or focal cerebral contusion or hemorrhage on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • documented traumatic brain injury within 6 months of randomization
  • Rancho Los Amigos Scale (RLAS) cognitive level of 5-7 at time of randomization
  • age 18 or older
  • active duty military member or veteran
  • anticipated length of needed acute interdisciplinary TBI rehabilitation of 30 days or more

Exclusion Criteria

  • history of prior moderate to severe traumatic brain injury or other pre-injury severe neurologic or psychiatric condition, such as psychosis, stroke, multiple sclerosis, or spinal cord injury.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

(1) Functional independence (i.e., ability to live independently with less than 3 hours of assistance per week) (2) Return to work/school (i.e., paid employment or school enrollment, either full or part time)

Time Frame: One-year Follow-up

Secondary Outcomes

  • The Functional Independence Measures (FIM)33, 34 consisting of motor and cognitive scores and the Disability Rating Scale Score (DRS)35 were measured.(Discharge from Protocol Treatment)
  • Quality of life, psychosocial function, behavioral, and mood state measures(One-year Follow-up)

Similar Trials