Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06715969
NCT06715969Enrolling By InvitationNot Applicable

Comparison of the Effects of Myofascial Release and Fascial Induction Therapy Techniques on Pain, Flexibility and Fascial Architecture.

Doğan Burak Endamli2 sites in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: November 15, 2024Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Enrolling By Invitation
Sponsor
Enrollment
60
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
pain

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the different effects of two different fascial treatments on pain, flexibility and Asian architecture.

2 different groups 8 sessions, two different fascial treatments will be applied in accordance with the intake criteria, the individuals will be re-evaluated before the treatment, after 8 sessions of treatment and 3 months after the end of the study.

Detailed Description

Chronic low back pain is a disease that causes the loss of working days in the world, causes significant disability and health costs, and cannot be fully diagnosed. It ranks second among the job loss factors and is considered the most important factor affecting the decline in production.

Until recent years, conservative treatment of all types of low back pain included bed rest for a certain period of time. This situation has changed over time with studies, and today's treatment is to gradually increase the level of activity according to the person's level with minimal bed rest.

Chronic low back pain is seen as a disorder that 70% of people can experience at least once in their lives. Today, it is one of the most common and expensive syndromes of modern times, reaching a rate of 80% in Europe. The participants experiencing the negative effects of chronic low back pain has disadvantages such as health and medical research expenses for the community, while experiencing pain, decreased daily living activities, decreased work productivity or disappearance.

There are no regional, national and international guidelines for the treatment of chronic low back pain. There is no strong recommendation for a specific physiotherapy approach yet. Studies to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to this focus on the structural pathology of the spine and related tissues, neuropsychosocial factors and motor control abnormalities. On the other hand, the fascia of the lumbal region received little attention.

Several researchers have suggested that fascias may play a role in the pathophysiology of LBP. In one study, it was seen that the thoracolumbal fascia (TLF) was thicker in the ultrasound image of people who experienced LBP than in normal people. Recent studies have shown a relationship between LBP and facial tissue. However, there is no treatment program for this.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
35 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients between 35-60 years old
  • Patients with low back pain for at least 3 months
  • Patients with pain 4 and above according to VAS
  • Having not received FTR and manual therapy for the last 3 months
  • Those who have not received medical treatment for the last 3 months and those who will not

Exclusion Criteria

  • Those with a history of back and spine surgery
  • Patients with a history of trauma
  • Those with instable neurological findings
  • Having a pathology such as hernia and root pressure in the lumbal region
  • Regular users of analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Communication problem that will prevent the implementation of evaluations and/or treatment program

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

pain

Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

We expect a decrease in pain at the end of 4 weeks. We expect a decrease in the value of the visual analog scale (VAS). According to this scale, it shows 10 very severe pains and 0 pains. We look at the VAS values of people both before and after the study.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Doğan Burak Endamli
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Doğan Burak Endamli

Expert physiotherapist

Hasan Kalyoncu University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials